How can we improve Yahoo News?

stop the liberal bias just report the news

8th ranked
Sign in
or sign in with
  • yahoo
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Joe SweeneyJoe Sweeney shared a merged idea: You have decided to not allow comments on your news articles because too many people disagree with your liberal bias. F-off!  ·   · 


    Sign in
    or sign in with
    • yahoo
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        What liberal bias. I see more than enough garbage posted from the mindless Alt-right.

      • brucebruce commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        by running nothing but pro-Clinton and anti-Trump, your credibility as a news source is severely compromised. why don't you go back to being an information platform instead of a biased opinion monger.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        wow. I don't know what planet you come from but I was just searching for a way to leave feedback on how right-wing and conservative Yahoo! has become, in general. I have used Yahoo since 1999 and have had it set as my home page for a number of years and it has gone downhill, seriously in the last year or two. The lack of ability to leave general feedback directly to Yahoo! shows how useless and uninterested in its customers is has become. After all these years I am now thinking I must switch services and stop using Yahoo! altogether. Its become a joke. In particular, the news and featured "articles" on the homepage. Sad. Seems like their revenue is going in the same direction. I imagine they won't be around in any capacity much longer if they continue this trend.

      • Giancarlo PrefecturoGiancarlo Prefecturo commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The news is biased which means it IS NOT TRUTHFUL. Therefore, who is going to claim to WANT to take their news here if it is a GIVEN that it leans and is thus NOT reliable and accurate? Opinion and nonsense must be kept in that area and it should NOT come UP as part of the news area. The two are initially together as if ONE. You have to sort OUT the fluff and the ranting to get to the "news". It is then logical for most limited brain Americans to falsely presume the remainder IS fair and balanced news. However, this could only be so viewed by those who prefer to take their news from tarnished sources in the first place. It is only a weak brained person who believes bad sources make for good news who could possibly read the "news side of Yahoo news" and NOT see the not so very subtle way they attempt to lean and twist the news. They are very good at leaving things out and never drilling down too far to find out what those annoying little statistics REALLY mean. You know, Mr. Trump does not always or even usually squint and point. On Yahoo, this is the only picture of him you will see. They do it visually as well.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        "Anonymous, who is actually too much of a coward to even use a name, needs to go read his news someplace else if he doesn't like the news here."

        Then why do we both use it? LOL!!!!!

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Anthony decides all is fair, then calls somebody a teabagger. You can't make this stuff up.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The media overwhelmingly donates much more to the democrats, than they do republicans. Yahoo definitely will not change their bias.

      • Joe SweeneyJoe Sweeney commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Your censorship of opinions contrary to your 100% liberal view of the world won't wash. It only shows how biased you are and your unwillingness to consider any opposing argument.

      • AnthonyAnthony commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        no idea what you're talking about OP, I see articles from The Blaze and the Daily Caller right up alongside articles from Salon and HuffPost, I read them all and decide for myself. I suppose a teabagger such as yourself can't handle being exposed to ideas conflict with your own...

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Anonymous, who is actually too much of a coward to even use a name, needs to go read his news someplace else if he doesn't like the news here.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        what liberal bias ??all yahoo seems to want is to sell everything all the time. use of profile data w target ads stupid and annoying let subscribers request ad info you'll get more reliable data and actually help them occasionally

      • cy ellency ellen commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Yaachhhooo will NEVER allow their customers to select which news source (or even journalist). Their “less like this” is a totally nonfunctional smokescreen. The will force their liberal agenda down our throats no matter what. They even hide ultra-liberal hit pieces by giving them titles that completely lie about their content just to get you to open them knowing the majority of their readers are actively ignoring the bulk of the liberal garbage. The 3 top complaints from yahoo customers are:
        1) Kardashian refuse. Totally ignored by yahoo…
        2) Video irritants. Totally ignored by yahoo…
        3) Extreme liberal news bias. Totally ignored by yahoo…
        Everyone should complain to yahoo asking for a REAL content preferences selection where you can actually select source and journalist you don’t want to see.
        Of course the liberal sicko’s will insult you claiming you should be forced to read their garbage as a freedom of the press thing or something.

      • luke skywalkerluke skywalker commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate


      • PhD.MITPhD.MIT commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        A NUCLEAR BOMB detonated 100 MILES in ANY direction from NYC in a boat, plane or truck would KILL most infidels in NYC by BURNING or RADIATION SICKNESS from RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT IN DAYS, WEEKS, MONTHS OR YEARS. Obama said about 3 months ago: "I AM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT A NUCLEAR BOMB IN NYC.". The UTTER HORROR IS that recent events have CONVERGED to make a NUKED NYC LIKELY IN 0-5 YEARS. 1st the AVAILABILITY of a nuclear bomb from IRAN, the CRAZY KID in North Korea, TALIBAN raids NOW in PAKISTAN which has 50-100 NUCLEAR BOMBS and 2nd ISIS NOW has 2 BILLION $ to BUY NUCLEAR BOMBS, many terrorists with WESTERN PASSPORTS, and many SAFE HAVENS in Iraq and Syria to prepare a NUKED NYC, as 9/11 was prepared in Aftganistan. Liberal Couric in 2008 gave us Obama, who did not destroy ISIS before ISIS got to Iraqi cities and consequently Obama/Couric gave us the above.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Suggestions like this are sad. It points to the fundamental problem of our existence: Conservative types think facts are 'liberal' and then complain about them. When will they ever get smart? Then the world would be a utopia.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Yahoo is too right wing. the articles need to be the facts. and those facts are left wing. The right wing is just stupid and uninformed

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        half of American is fed up with the mainstream media's liberal bias. Try to be different from them and stick to objective journalism.

      • Benard JonesBenard Jones commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I agree. I understand how "Sensational Unbalanced Headlines" can garnish a lot of comments/ advertisers but I think many of those comments are angry and my guess is many of those folks are fed up and want to consider other online sources for news and entertainment.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Yes we know you are liberal. But you don't need to rub our noses
        in it every day. You know not everyone agrees with your thoughts.

      ← Previous 1

      Feedback and Knowledge Base