I love the current additions you have made to your platform over the summer.
However, I have been doing drafts for about 2 weeks now and I have noticed that your "fantasy points" category hasn't changed. I am now at the point where I can draft a 98 A+ team in a 12 man league by knowing which injured players will give me the best value. There is no way these teams would work in real life.
Instead of giving predicted fantasy points (and never changing them), why don't you just rank the players by Tiers in the mock drafts.
Ex: Hilton would be a tier 2, WR 15 where as Kenny Stills would be tier 4, WR 38.
This way these questionable fantasy points wouldnt influence owners decisions. It sounds dumb but draft grades and ranks due influence owners and their pride.
Ken Wilson commented
My draft grade was C+ you claim the best draft was made by Hicks. That team finished dead last with a 2-12 record. Your grading system is obviously flawed.
Steven rain commented
They should give draft grades on the entire team of a draft not just the starting team. I get a D or C every team I draft and it is because I draft deep at RB and WR and let my TE slip but every year the bench and who I pick up throughout the season is what wins it for me. I have 20 teams a year and I am in the playoffs every year with almost every team. Draft the bench not just the starters