Trade review process needs to more open
In one of my Yahoo managed paid leagues, Aaron Jones is being traded for Leonard Fournette. This is btwn a top 2 team getting Fournette from 10th ranked team.
If this trade goes through, which we have no idea into what the review process looks for, then we might as well say bye-bye to our money.
I would love to get more visibility into review process. What factors do you take into consideration? How do you rate a protest? etc,
Yahoo-commissioned leagues are so inconsistent on how trades are judged.
I think outside of something like clear collusion or the equivalent of a roster-dump, lop-sided trades should be ok.
More importantly: I think whatever it means to "ensure that all managers in a league are competing on a fair and level playing field" should be applied consistently between trades.
Vetoing one unbalanced trade but allowing another doesn't maintain a "fair and level playing field", it compromises it.
kyle commons commented
i would love to know if an aaron jones for fournette trade actually was the difference maker in your league. go read matthew berrys article on why you should never veto a trade. i really hope i never play in a money league with you Kash if you feel the need to vent frustration over a trade like that. why do you even play fantasy then?