Scoring - General feedback and requests
General feedback regarding scoring options and requests for new scoring options and categories.
-Goalie scoring (G, A, PIM)
-Faceoff win %
-Bonus points for hat trick
-Takeaways, Takeaway/Giveaway ratio
-PIM as a negative
-Average time on ice
-Special teams points (SH+PP points)
Mark Myers commented
Get rid of the +/- please. It's so stupid. Replace with blocks or even FOW and everyone is happy
Alexander Festa commented
Let's start with "PIM as a negative" at the very least, and pleeeease add "Goalie scoring (G, A, PIM)" as secondary importance. After that the other categories would be cool but, to me, unnecessary.
Kyle Weber commented
Can we get fights as a category? PIM is a negative to a team typically, unless it's a fight that changes the momentum of the game.
Minimum Goalie Starts for head to head penalty should be allowed to edit points or minus automatic points if not met.
Defensive scoring points would be an awesome add!
As a commissioner we should be able to have more options with scoring and settings.
Matthew Hunt commented
Special teams points would be very nice and I would love it if we could add even-strength save percentage (EVSV%)
Ray Bishoff commented
More than a cool option my friend. Especially the game winning goal! I am completely shocked as my first time playing in a fantasy hockey league that a GAME WINNING GOAL no matter when scored doesn't count for anything.......I am baffled that this is not an hot butting for everyone. Once again, it is the goal that decided the winner and is literally pointless! Shocked, completely shocked! Oh ya did I say, I can't believe this?" I can understand for all the other stats, as not all games go into OT, but the goal that wins the game, this is an actual stat that just gets completely removed and what
stuns me more is everyone seems OK with it. This post should be overloaded with people freaking out about this. As you can plainly see, I am!
Kevin Vanstone commented
Considering how simple it is at a computer science level, they are intentionally holding it back.
It's so frustrating, and clearly demonstrates Yahoo intends to charge its customers for every little feature in the future.
Go ahead and prove me wrong, team. But I fear I'll be on FanTrax before this is fixed.
Robert Luke commented
Any update on if GP could be added to the stats section and not only under average stats?!
Sean Taylor commented
No idea how Yahoo hasn't fixed this yet.... it must not affect enough leagues, but still this fix should take less than an hour.
Kevin Vanstone commented
Restore Average Stats to 2 decimal places.
In previous years, my (even number) points league still displayed the average fantasy points generated to two decimal places.
Why was this functionality removed?
Robert Luke commented
Add Games Played (GP) column when viewing players stats anywhere on the site, such as under Players or My Watch List etc. Without seeing GP, stats are meaningless.
I would love to see a category for defensive scoring bonus, hat trick bonus and primary assists put into Yahoo leagues!
This is a needed feature!
This should definitely be a feature added SOON!
Tanner Ioannoni commented
Please add this
Ant Ony commented
WAYYYYY OVERDUE COME ON YAHOO!!!!!!
GOALIE POINTS MATTER!!!
Scott Cowan commented
Set up category averages for Head-to-Head (Goals per game, etc.) with a minimum threshold for games played to meet every week. Much like how goalies currently work.
Victor Wong commented
I would like to see leagues be able to assign a point value for goalies that lose in overtime.
Stan Siebert commented
Please - is there any way to add Defense specific scoring to the Yahoo Hockey Pool scoring? Even if it was just one category of "Defense Points" where commissioners could make any D scoring worth 1.5 or 1.25 or what ever they choose. Currently there is no possible way to set up scoring so that the top Defense come close to the top forwards in fantasy scoring. Please consider this. Thank you.
Scott Schneider commented
You have 5-year-old and older requests re: position eligibility that are still "gathering feedback," and are ranked at or near the top of this section, as if they're relevant. What a joke.
We have been clamoring for inclusion of FO% (not to mention takeaways/giveaways) for SEVERAL years; the only response we've received is silence, and the highest the request has been ranked on your list is about 11th. I'm not buying it.
If you cared to do anything about it, you easily could. Why not just admit that you couldn't care less what people want? At least get back to people and tell them to **** off. It'd be better than pretending you're giving us a voice and just ignoring us.