For yahoo NBA cup, I realize that I'm complaining about a free contest where I can win money, so if nothing gets done about this I will in no way be outraged.
That being said, I think that the taking the top 20 of the 24 contests is a good idea, but I think it should be the top 20 rankings vs the top 20 scores.
The first week the top score was 360, and a score of 300 would get you somewhere around 1500th place for the week. The following week a score of 300 would have gotten you 100th place, which is much better.
By taking away only the four lowest scores, it negates possibly someones really good week and penalizes a person for not having as great a week when the scores were super high.
Just my opinion.

Can we have the ability to establish a "league" so that we don't have to set up a new game each week? We want to set up a private game for our friends, but we don't want to have to set up a new game each week for NFL. It'd be ideal if the games were already "created" for each week and only available to the league members.

Secondarily, allow the game to be "guaranteed" so that it runs even if the league doesn't have 100% participation. If we have 20 players and only 16 fill out their roster, then we would want it to continue.

I often look at the fppg avg column during a live game to see the potential points a player could score by the end of the game. When I originally chose Cam Newton, he had an average of 22. Now that his current game is in the second quarter, his fppg average is down to 15. I believe it is averaging in the 8 points that he's scored so far. However, with more than half of the game left, it doesn't make sense to average in his points for the current game. It would be much more useful if the average only included points from completed games.