Yahoo Homepage
Welcome to our Yahoo Homepage feedback forum!
If you would be interested in participating in User Research studies for Yahoo Homepage, please fill out this form.
This is a place for you to help shape the Yahoo Homepage experience. We review the most popular, feasible ideas from this forum to make positive changes to your Yahoo Homepage.
Here are some guidelines for using this forum:
- Please search and vote before posting! If your idea (or an idea very similar to yours) has already been posted, please vote for it. Duplicated ideas may be moved.
- This forum is for feedback and ideas only. Unfortunately, we cannot provide support here. For support, please find answers on our help site.
- Please do not post personal information (such as email addresses, phone numbers or names) on the forum.
The Yahoo product feedback forum requires a valid Yahoo ID and password. If you do not have a Yahoo ID or the password to your Yahoo ID, please sign-up for a new account.
If you have a valid Yahoo ID and password, follow these steps if you would like to remove your posts, comments, votes, and/or profile from the Yahoo product feedback forum.
111 results found
-
Why have all of my posts been rejected? I get attacked by others, (democrats), and they are never rejected
I have been not able to post anything for over 2 months, for no reason. today I posted that yahoo would like, and guess what, they posted it. So I posted another one, and they deleted it. Well, well...no more free speech from yahoo.
364th ranked -
206th ranked
-
Get rid of FOX news, or seriously curtail the amount of stories ... It's NOT News
Get rid of FOX news, or seriously curtail the amount of stories ... It's NOT News
183rd ranked -
233rd ranked
-
233rd ranked
-
Bring back news max and their articles
We need equity among news networks please have more Republican news outlets articles.
There are to many democrats news compared to Republican news outlets.364th ranked -
Overrun with Fox News stories.
Way, way too many alt-right Fox News articles on your website. Please give your users an option to block them.
127th ranked -
162nd ranked
-
Why did you remove the option to choose the publishers we prefer? The less choice Yahoo! gives to its users, the less users will visit Yahoo
Why did you remove the option to choose the publishers we prefer? The less choice Yahoo! gives to its users, the less users will visit Yahoo! This should be improved not removed.
147th ranked -
Can you not profit off of antisemitism?
I know it's asking a lot from an Big Tech company like yours to stop promoting comments on articles that, say, highlight the need to vigilant against antisemitism. But then again, IBM made a helluvalot of money whoring themselves out to the Nazi regime, so why wouldn't the sweet and innocent engineers of Yahoo attract the attention of today's Nazis? Stay useless, Yahoo.
287th ranked -
Looking for more substance in your articles
So tired of headlines, pictures and articles of women baring their bodies to the world. So superficial and lacking of respect .
233rd ranked -
Stop pandering to the libtards news is a two way street please do both directions
Be neutral in reporting the news and stop pandering to the libtards
287th ranked -
Rachel Shewfelt being a liar
A 1st grader could've caught Rachel's lie. Anderson met Peters at ******* mansiin in 1990 after being in the city only a day! The description under picture of those 2 clearly reads 1989. Not to mention she was in ******* OCTOBER 1989. Being able to lie better than a 1st grader is journalism 101 for idiots and its clear Megan failed it
287th ranked -
Why am I unable to recover posted comments and replies?
Get rid of OpenWeb as moderator. Stop scanning every comment for those you don't like and stop censoring comments and denying peoples right to freedom of speech. Removing that ignorant blonde running this joke of browser might help, too. I hope Elon Musk targets you as his next takeover and flushes you insane liberals down the toilet where you belong, Country destroyers.
206th ranked -
Bring back comments for articles. No reason to visit site otherwise.
Being able to comment on articles and share views with others is essential when using a news site. You have removed the comments. If you are not going to allow comments, expect your traffic to decrease. I know that I and many other commenters will abandon you if you do not return the comment sections.
233rd ranked -
Change Yahoo's Name
Change the name of Yahoo to: "***** and Butts" due to the high frequency of pics you show on the homepage of nearly naked narcissistic women who are so starved for attention that they think *********** is the answer. With every such picture you publish you should be forced to publish an article about positive body image and self-worth.
183rd ranked -
Stop being so liberal and woke. Everyone does not believe the same garbage as your poorly written articles
Stop being liberal and woke. Your sophomoric liberal articles do not represent America and are frustrating to look at when I login to your poorly manufactured email platform. I could easily write a yahoo article, for example...."trump is a criminal, hes a racist, adam kinzinger is amazing and brave, AOC is beautiful" publish....stop posting personal opinion pieces and put some news out there.
140th ranked -
Stop making sensational Opinionated articles about Russia/Ukraine to get people hyped up for war in Ukraine with Russia its disgusting Yahoo
Stop making sensational articles and Titles about Russia/Ukraine to get people "hyped" up for war in Ukraine with Russia its disgusting Yahoo
252nd ranked -
Get a new news media team!! All they do is slam Trump and anything to do with him!!!!
Who the **** writes your news commentaries?? Are you trying to take twitters place? Fake News!! Can you HONESTLY say that we are better off under Biden???? (Hunter, CCP, on and on. Do your research!!
287th ranked -
I don't like Trump, but your Tax Article is FAKE NEWS
While I hate Trump's personality, this article perfectly illustrates why Trump denounces "FAKE NEWS" : According to the tax returns POSTED IN THE ARTICLE he paid: 2015 = 735,172; 2016 = 614,299; 2017 = 284,718; 2018 = 2,068,822; 2019 = 460,977; 2020 = 271,973 Yet the lead in the article claims he "paid $750 in 2017" So misleading. Not defending Trump, his words or his actions, just pointing out how the media distorts information to fit their narrative.
287th ranked
- Don't see your idea?