Stop the anti-Trump propaganda!
Moving on from Yahoo! For 2 days straight (and this isn't the first time on the topic) you have on your homepage about the Bill that could remove the President from office. Stop trying to incite another civil war! If you would read the 25th amendment you would know that in order for this to happen it would need the cooperation of the Vice-President as he would be the deciding vote on such action. So change the record and report news that is actually something of relevance.
-
slath Garner commented
No. I love the anti Trump propaganda, its makes me laugh that Trump lives in their heads rent free.
-
S197 PONY commented
Stop threatening Civil War.
-
Diane commented
A Yahoo user who said he was a military veteran with a purple heart criticized how Israel treats Palestinians, so the Yahoo moderator doxed him. Turns out the military veteran was a man in his 70s living in a dangerous city in California. I reported this to Yahoo customer care, so the Yahoo moderator permanently removed my ability to make any comments on articles and removed from my account all of the comments I had ever made, for over two decades with Yahoo, a total of 2.7 thousand comments which had received 6.9 thousand likes. AOL has an identical format with articles and comments section, except AOL allows conservatives to comment. You don't even need an AOL email account, and every conservative comment I've posted that Yahoo has removed, AOL has no problem with, and allows me to debate politics with other users. Don't stay with Yahoo while they enrich themselves by silencing you.
-
Bruce W commented
1. It's NOT propaganda,
2. Just because YOU feel it's anti something, that doesn't mean it is false! -
ray carr commented
Trump's a criminal rat.
-
Irene commented
Today, there was an article titled "Am I a Fetish or the Prettiest Girl In The Room? Why Attractive Black Women trigger White People" The article claimed that the painting "A Pair of Broad Bottoms" had been made to objectify black women, resulting in the expectation that black women have large bottoms and twerk. When I pointed out that the two people in the painting were actual people at the time (Sarah Baartman and Lord Grenville), who looked the way the painting had depicted, the moderator kept removing my comment. Apparently, he can't be bothered to do a google search before determining if my comment is factual enough to be posted.
The same is true for a later comment I tried to give explaining that only a small fraction of white Americans descend from ***** owners. This is a fact that has been attested to by several experts, including Nell Irvine Painter, an African American black studies professor and historian at Princeton University, in her book "The History of White People". Even snopes tries to exaggerate the percentage by pointing out that Adam Rothman, a historian at Georgetown University, claims 7.4% of white Americans owned slaves. Well, that's still a small fraction. Snopes takes issue because this number includes non-*****-holding states, but my comment never claimed to be only about *****-holding states and, further, ***** ownership came nowhere close to the majority of white households even in the South. Some states were worse than others, but I didn't specify I was discussing any specific state. Rather, I clarified I'm discussing white Americans today, the majority of whom, as I said, "do not descend from *****-owners". As widely known as this fact is, when I tried to post it, the Yahoo moderator blocked me from making any more comments and threatened to remove my yahoo account. Am I supposed to lie and claim the bulk of white Americans DO descend from ***** owners? Because your "terms and conditions" claim we're not supposed to lie in the comments section. If we are only allowed to post "facts", how come both your articles and the comments section are filled with leftist inaccuracies that we will have our Yahoo accounts removed for trying to correct?
-
Irene commented
Ever since the Capitol riot, Yahoo has brought us photos and videos focused on each individual involved, claimed we need to remove free speech from the internet, and encouraged family members to turn eachother in: none of which Yahoo did during the much deadlier BLM riots over the summer. Yahoo gives us all of the info: name, occupation, history, etc. of each and every person there, but they didn't think we needed any such coverage regarding looters and arsonists in BLM. Today, they brought us this ridiculous video analyzing the "hate symbols" worn in the Capitol riots: "This guy made an 'OK' hand signal, this guy appears to be wearing a Bugs Bunny tattoo, lots of people wearing yellow", sort of thing. "We're not sure if the protestors understand the significance of their hand signals, tattoos, or colors" yada yada. Yahoo's bias has always been rather maddening when they aren't busy being laughable.
-
Timothy Hess commented
Yahoo has over 1200 separate complaints about their bias and the lack of comments section. They have reviewed some but gave no comments as to what they decided. They have others that are "Gathering feedback". Some like the one I am commenting within dates to July 14, 2017....either Yahoo is really slow and dense or they, which it seems more likely, just ignore their users! Instead of sending complaints to Yahoo, start sending them to the FTC.
-
a c commented
Yahoo may as well be a Biden campaign headquarters. They shut off commenting because the comments were all pro-Trump. The tech-tyrants as trying to censor us. Listen to Dan Bongino. He breaks it all down for you.
-
N H commented
Yahoo is liberal propaganda.
-
Mark Shisler commented
Quit doing news
-
Anonymous commented
see above
-
Anonymous commented
BETTER NEWS
-
Anonymous commented
I totally agree. Thank you for saying it.