It is ironic that I would be writing this comment about an article that is by a writer,
That works for the Wall St, Journal because I have written a couple of
comments about this magazine. This article coming out of the WSJ is not
surprising to me because they are strictly a Republican rag. And the whole reason I have written lately about this mags writing because to me it has gotten an edge I have never noticed before. It has always had the GOP leanings but now it has taken on a nastiness it didn't have before and I attribuate to being a Trump mag and supporter. Since Trump has been president the Republican supporters have taken on that ragged edge and I do not like it and it is not necessary
in my opinion but it is apparent they find it necessary to something I
feel comes from free. You know like a rattlesnake only striking when they feel in danger. This is what is apparent coming out of the WSJ
in recent times. I read that the writters of the other WSJ that covers the financial side of the paper have even asked the Editors of a way they
could separate the two because they were not liking the tone the WSJ
was taking. So about Jill Biden-it was apparent that the piece was meant with disrespect and this nasty edginess, it is not appealing to the people who read the WSJ but it does appeal to the "BASE' that they are now being called. It is a distinction where Trump's :"BASE" IS
noticed and it also appears it is the group of people who include the
THE PROUD BOYS, WHITE SUPREMIST, and the Q-ANON'S and lately I have noticed that they are also including what I call the 'KOOL-
AID BRICADE". So if this is how they strike back like a rattlesnake to
shoow disrespect to a woman that they do not know, at lease, we will
understand what context they represent.