Brett Laste
My feedback
6 results found
-
4th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Brett Laste
supported this idea
·
-
20th rankedBrett Laste
supported this idea
·
-
29th rankedBrett Laste
supported this idea
·
-
1st rankedBrett Laste
supported this idea
·
-
1st rankedBrett Laste
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Brett Laste
commented
Great idea
-
5th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Brett Laste
commented
If you have a keeper pool based of the NHL, why would you want to discount hits and blocks from offensive players? That is like excluding goals and assists from defensive players. If a player gets a goal, it is a goal no matter their position. If a player gets a hit, it is still a hit whether they are a forward or defense.
You want your league to value D, but you are devaluing two-way forwards who are great on defense! This is a bad suggestion.
Come on Yahoo. This is absurd. You have NHL teams on your platform that don't have a single RW listed!
This feels like an April Fool's prank at this point. The Athletic even wrote an article about what a cluster your hockey eligibility issues are.
Stop gaslighting us and use the position eligibility designations that everyone else uses - or at least use the positions that your own player profiles use? You can't even get this right internally? Embarrasing.