Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 10th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  261 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    You could do better. You could give the top 4 teams a win, the 2 middle teams a tie, and the bottom 4 teams a loss.
    You could do better. You could have each team play each team each week. That eliminates much more of the luck factor.
    You could do better. You could use Total Points scoring for the season and not even mess with wins and losses. The truly best team in the league is the one which scores the most total points during the season.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Let's say that a league with six teams produces these scores during a week: 84, 83, 82, 81, 52, and 51.
    Would you seriously award an extra victory point to the team with 82 points, but not award a point to the team with 81 points?
    Would you seriously treat the team with 81 points the same as the team with 52 points?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Let's say that a league with six teams produces these scores during a week: 84, 83, 82, 81, 52, and 51.
    Would you seriously award an extra victory point to the team with 82 points, but not award a point to the team with 81 points?
    Would you seriously treat the team with 81 points the same as the team with 52 points?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    What if in some week the ten teams in your league score: 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 44, 43, 42, and 41 points.
    Would you really give a victory point to the team which scored 82 points, but not give one to the team which scored 81 points?
    Why would you treat the team which scored 81 points the same as the team which scored 44 points?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    So, let's say that in some week the ten teams in your league score: 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 44, 43, 42, and 41 points.
    Would you really give a victory point to the team which scored 82 points, but not give one to the team which scored 81 points?
    Why would you treat the team which scored 81 points the same as the team which scored 44 points?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree that Cross-Country scoring needs to be implemented.
    Note to Stephen Staple: Giving the top half of the teams a win and the bottom half of the teams a loss each week is a step in the right direction. However, it's only a step. A better system would be to give the top third of the teams a win, the middle third a tie, and the bottom third a loss. An even better system would be to have each team play each team each week.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Why don't we go to having every team play every team every week?
    It would be so much more fair.
    It would be easier to understand (and explain).
    And, it would be easier code for the programmers to write.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with JJ that head-to-head play often results in lesser teams making the play-offs because of the "luck of the schedule."
    And I agree with Jim that having every team play every team every week is a better solution than what JJ suggested.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with the comments below that "Mike" posted on July 19 and that "Me" posted on Oct.24.

  2. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  142 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hey Anonymous -- Your equation doesn't start with zero.
    Perhaps you meant to say starting with the zero yard line?
    I would call it the goal line.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes, an equation would be better. That's not to say that more scoring categories isn't an improvement. But, an equation would be a superior improvement.
    Note to Anonymous: Why are you calling yourself what I call myself?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Continuing with the logic of valuing plays which make a first down above other plays, we obviously should change our scoring for tackles. We should give a bonus to a defensive player who tackles an opponent before he makes a first down instead of after he makes it. And we should give a bonus to DEF teams which hold the offense to a FG rather than a TD. Yup, this kind of thinking is crazy, but no more crazy than giving a bonus for making a first down.
    .
    Regarding the player who catches a screen pass and is then tackled for a loss, he probably deserves the bonus for catching a pass. The defense maybe should be rewarded with a bonus for tackling him for a loss. Often, defenses are good at stopping offensive plays. And often, just being able to catch a pass against a good defense is quite an accomplishment. Perhaps a penalty should be assessed against the QB for throwing the pass in that situation -- or maybe it is already assessed in that the lost yardage will be reflected in the QB's passing yards for the game. Further, the lost yardage will be reflected in the receiver's yards for the game. But, the receiver must catch the ball before he can start running with it, and the fact that he managed to catch the ball should be rewarded.

  3. 34th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  9 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yes, this idea is an improvement.
    And, using an equation should be a way to shorten (simplify) the computer code for the game instead of having to program in so many categories of scoring.

  4. 25th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  39 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Position Eligibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Should we also have team RBs and team WRs and team TEs?
    .
    Team QBs will be a mess if / when the Wildcat QB becomes popular again.

  5. 22nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  40 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 19th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  47 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    You guys need to quit hating on Adam.
    He probably didn't really like the changes any more than you did.
    He probably wrote that BS to get the Yahoo guys to like him
    and to actually read and consider his opinion
    that the black background is the worst problem
    with the 2013 re-do of what was once a really good gaming system.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    ??? a fence turtle ???

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I want to expand on the message I posted here in Sept.
    I mentioned "black-on-white" when describing the old format.
    But much more is involved than just the color scheme.
    Team logos have been rounded.
    The message board is now inconvenient to use.
    The commissioner's note is stuck way down scroll.
    The emphasis seems to have been changed from inter-action with other players to x-ing out notices about stupid medals.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    No, actually, the new format sucks.
    Please allow me to use the old black-on-white format.

  7. 7th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  63 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    A fun idea. And, with the turmoil and frustrations created by this year's re-design of Fantasy Football, Yahoo needs to have some fun ideas.

  8. 18th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  55 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base