Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 4th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Back up RBs are really really really valuable. I want to be able to keep a couple of them onhand. This rule sounds like you would be preventing me from using this wise choice. Why would you want to keep me from making a wise choice?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I'd want as many RBs as I could get. RBs are frequently injured, demoted, or ignored. The NFL probably goes through about a hundred starting and committee RBs per year, and even the elite ones aren't used much some weeks. If I didn't have a good extra RB, then I'd have to try to be the first person to check the waiver wire each week that one of RBs is injured or on a bye or meeting a team with a good run defense.
    Putting a limit on the number on your roster favors the person who sits with his computer on his lab ready to pounce on an RB immediately when something goes wrong.
    The limit also presents an ugly problem when an injury causes a few games to be missed. If you have 4 RBs, the odds are that one will be on his bye week at the same time that another one has a two-week injury and another one is scheduled to play against the third best run defense in the NFL. You almost have to find another RB to take the place of one of the ones on your roster, but you can't afford to drop any of the three described above. So, what do you do?
    If during the draft you picked up a couple of RBs who are part of a committee, then you could limp along until your injuries and bye weeks are solved. If not, then you lose to the person who is sitting with his computer in his lap ready to pounce on whatever RB looks promising for the next week.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with the note posted here on Jan.26.
    It sucks when a league's commissioner changes the rules after the draft.
    And the problem isn't just for this proposed rule.
    The problem exists for almost every change that a commissioner can make.
    Rule changes simply shouldn't be allowed after the draft is completed.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    If I were in MaveROCK's league, I'd want as many RBs as I could get. RBs are frequently injured, demoted, or ignored. The NFL probably goes through about a hundred starting and committee RBs per year, and even the elite ones aren't used much some weeks. If I didn't have a good extra RB, then I'd have to try to be the first person to check the waiver wire each week that one of RBs is injured or on a bye or meeting a team with a good run defense.
    Putting a limit on the number on your roster favors the person who sits with his computer on his lab ready to pounce on an RB immediately when something goes wrong.
    The limit also presents an ugly problem when an injury causes a few games to be missed. If you have 4 RBs, the odds are that one will be on his bye week at the same time that another one has a two-week injury and another one is scheduled to play against the third best run defense in the NFL. You almost have to find another RB to take the place of one of the ones on your roster, but you can't afford to drop any of the three described above. So, what do you do?
    If during the draft you picked up a couple of RBs who are part of a committee, then you could limp along until your injuries and bye weeks are solved. If not, then you lose to the person who is sitting with his computer in his lap ready to pounce on whatever RB looks promising for the next week.

  2. 97th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  11 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 200th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 113th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  6 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 113th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  7 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Can't Cut List  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 121st ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  7 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 109th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  12 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I'd be happy enough to get FGs scored using an equation -- and let the Commish set the multiplier.
    Please consider something like: Each FG is worth (multiplier x yards), but always at least 3 points.
    So, if the Commish puts the multiplier at one point per 10 yards, a 40 yard FG would be 4 points.
    So, if the Commish puts the multiplier at one point per 5 yards, a 40 yard FG would be 8 points.

    With the minimum 3 point rule, a team on the one yard line would still receive 3 points.

  8. 81st ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  20 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Position Eligibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I would hate to join a league and then have the Commish put in a rule which limits how many players I can have in each position.
    It's not necessary. It's not needed. It's not helpful.

  9. 132nd ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I would hate to join a league and then have the Commish put in a rule which limits how many players I can have in each position.
    It's not necessary. It's not needed. It's not helpful.

  10. 128th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  6 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 51st ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  11 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Position Eligibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Points for:
    + Number of punts in the game
    + Average length of punts in the game
    + Net distance (length of punts minus length of returns)
    + How close to the goal line the ball lands (or is fielded)
    + Number of touchbacks

  12. 109th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  4 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 28th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  19 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 32nd ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  15 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 88th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  2 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 48th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  5 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 46th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  12 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 126th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Fantasy Football  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 220th ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 132nd ranked
    Sign in Sign in with: Yahoo
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under review  ·  4 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Playoffs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base