DUKE DUKE
My feedback
5 results found
-
17th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment DUKE DUKE supported this idea · -
4th rankedDUKE DUKE supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment DUKE DUKE commentedI suggested adding a "Maximum Number of Roster Changes per Week" that will prevent excessive streaming. I think it's a more direct way to limit streaming than trying to determine what the maximum number of starts should be - which could unfairly limit a team that happens to have a high number of double start pitchers in a given week. Limiting how many roster changes per week a team owner can make DIRECTLY limits streaming. Please consider finding that suggestion and voting it up.
-
1st rankedDUKE DUKE supported this idea ·
-
16th rankedDUKE DUKE supported this idea ·
-
9th rankedDUKE DUKE supported this idea ·
There's a significant number of feature requests that would be resolved by allowing the maximum possible roster size to be 50 instead of 30. Allow commissioners to set this number and to determine the distribution of position types.
This would allow a commissioner to:
* Have 24 active positions, 6 BN (for leagues that want a Yahoo-traditional size roster).
* Have 13 active positions, 12 BN (for leagues that want a daily fantasy-sim type configuration with a 25 man roster, e.g. 8 position players, 1 SP, 4 RP)
* Have 25 active positions, 15 BN (for leagues wanting a 40-man roster)
* Have 25 active positions, 15 BN, 10 NA (for leagues wanting expanded minor league involvement)
The rationale I've seen for the 30 slot maximum has been to manage the player pool ***********. Yahoo shouldn't make this determination for every league; that is a decision that should be at the discretion of the individual leagues and commissioners.