Edit out whichever script causes previous choices of html or standard mail view, to be LOST.
Despite, INDIVIDUALS of whichever mere opinions are touted as somehow knowing' better, that the standard mail view is ... whatever... better, more reliable, than the html ...
it remains people's CHOICE, to use the html, when they select it ... HAVE, previously, selected it, if not also for it FAST loading and condense display, etc ... THEN FOR WHICHEVER REASONS, EVERY TIME ...
It should therefore REMAIN a chosEN selection, however temporarily chosen IF NOT RE-chosen also, on an ongoing basis ... just like any other selection, you might say...
BUT neither, when someone tries it, does their choice remain, NOR, do re-choosing choosers, of it, get their choices stored ... some 'knowing' better, INDIVIDUAL, likely some yuppie with ambitions beyond their ability, merely THINKs, they have an OPINION, that our choices, are somehow invalid, some not to be respected / acted upon. They do not, they in reality have some complex about others listening to them/accepting their advice, etc ... they are mere fantasisers, of their recogniseable-quality, as web-page writers ... as in ... can you trust me? Of course, we have to trust each other ... and look ... I'm modernizing something, by pretending I don't understand what the problem is here ... is that being a good boy/girl ? Do I get a treat? You DO, not care about old things, less high selling things, right? I am being the right kind of ****-ki##er? Co-confirm ... 'our', better knowing, by inflating what this really is?
Ok ok, just as long as you stay down here in the networking room, the server maintainance ... whatevers, I'm off to the Canaries w Turnbull...
RETAINING such a wretched employee, who has STILL not fixed the script for the page ... / from-the-use-of-the-page ... will only lose you customers/sign-ups, if not potential ones of your grouped services, if something, yes, minor ... BUT UNECCESSARY ... like this, frustrates them to the point of deciding to not use yahoo at all.
Recognising those who try to be helpful, is not some kind of weakness, but EXTERNALLY, many who are experienced with uneccessary stuff like this, can recogniese the LACK... of decision making / effort here ... not the claimed quality-of-choice.
Differences of opinion about what is or is not convenient for ALL, is irrellivent, when you spend time/effort elsewhere, in creating the basic html version, DIRECTING ppl to it as an alternative, etc ...
The kinds of INDIVIDUALS, who stubbornly pretend they somehow know what is best for EVERYone, are, ... well I shouldn't swear in these things... failing everyone else in effect, AS WELL, as however many customers/sign ups, are affected by their neglect.
It is ALSO not difficult to point out that something that overrides a selection every time you FIRST LOG IN, within some arbritrary time-frame ... a 1/2 hour? I dunno ... is of a script-function that does something ADDITIONAL, to otherwise working just fine, normal selection-retention , programmatically ... ie ... selection 1 = 0 , selection 2= 1 ... some code stores their choice ... BUT THEN..
this ADDITIONAL function / line, acts to change that in some false premise of "updating" , or "upgrading" , as though there are not ADVANTAGES, in using the basic html.
There are ... get over it, whoever you are.
VAIN, OUT OF DATE, SELF OBSESSIVE, THOUGHTLESS %#$& , yahoo ... your INDIVIDUALS, reveal more about themselves, when claiming such, than they do about supposedly 'unaware' , users of the basic html.