This was the comment I posted on the article:

""TERF,”,or Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist, has been used to describe a feminist who believes that biological sex determines gender"

This is NOT what gender critical feminists ("TERFs") believe.

We believe that people should be free to defy gender norms and express themselves however they please. "Gender" refers to social norms associated with sex. Stereotypes, basically. People shouldn't have to conform to those.

BUT we also believe that SEX--as opposed to gender/social norms--is determined by biology, and that law and social policy should not prioritize gender identity over sex.

Not "biological sex determines gender."

Those of us who hold this point of view are not all radical feminists. Neither are we all conservatives, or religious fundamentalists, or heterosexual. But the notion that radical feminists, in particular, believe that people should be pressured to conform to gender roles is beyond laughable. That is not the objection.

Surely Yahoo's reporters should attempt to fairly represent the positions they report about."

Please correct this misrepresentation. You should also know that "TERF" is not just innacurate; it is widely considered to be a slur.

Thank you,
Stacy Kennedy

HYPERVISOR TYPE 3 to cope with the translation from
x86 to RISC is desirable as there are a dedicated library

to do this feature. FYI.

00 = X86 PC Legacy
01 = X86 to APPLE RISC
10 = RISC OF NON SANSUMG DEVICES

11 = RISC OF SANSUNG EXYNOS 2022

Windows 11 on ARM initiative is yet to meet the success
that Microsoft wanted, but that didn’t lead to the
Redmond giant giving up on the idea of an ARM PC, at
least not yet. In fact, Microsoft and other
PC manufacturers are likely to be feeling more hopeful
than ever before about the future of ARM PCs as
Apple recently announced its strategy to move

from Intel to ARM-based Macs.

Unlike ARM-based Macs, which will be powered
by Apple’s A12Z Bionic chip, ARM-based PCs are powered
by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processor. Besides Qualcomm,
Samsung is another major chip manufacturer that is

reportedly working an ARM-based chip for Windows 11 ARM O.S.

Qualcomm: Transition from Windows PCs to Arm 'is inevitable',

says CEO

TECMUNDO, 01/04/2022 at 19:00' - 1 min reading.

Adriano Camacho via experts.

In order to meet the growing demand for virtual spaces,
increasingly connected to cloud and present solutions
in the modern day, Qualcomm announced a series of

New at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2022.

However, some surprises were anticipated, as is the case
of the new Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 computing platforms and
Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 — which should further expand the

Windows reach and support for the ARM RISC architecture.

More specifically, the Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 was developed
to deliver cutting-edge performance in the premium lines of
ultra-thin notebooks and laptops, which do not usually have
mechanical cooling solutions — like traditional

fans.

On the other hand, the Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 will reinforce the
entry systems, featuring advanced
artificial intelligence 2.0 and an improved connection to

5G signal frequencies.

In numbers, the solutions come to represent a
advance of up to 85% in the performance offered and up
to 60% in the energy efficiency against x86 architectures

competitors compared to the previous generation.

The improvements can be seen in their greatest form
on the more powerful and robust Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, which
also stands out for the debut of the 5 nm lithography

on Windows platforms.

During Qualcomm's CES 2022 presentation,
the company's CEO Cristiano Amon was punctual about

the importance of the solutions presented in advance:

"I know there was a lot of skepticism about the transition
from PC to ARM RISC, but it's happening, it's inevitable",

he said.

The bold comment was shared shortly after
Amon confirm that there are at least around 200 companies
testing or deploying Windows on
devices with Snapdragon — highlighting Black Veatch,

C Spire, Cisco, Lenovo, Verizon and T-Mobile.

To: SAMSUNG
Attn. Yoon-Ho Choi

Re: Seat down on a round table with the APOLLO team in order to provide the best
BUSINESS PLAN for the new YAHOO! game console and discuss how to be profitable,
as we have the YAHOO! Brand mark and obviously using it, to do the next gen game
console, intended to cope with the newest 6G of 1 THz band that is being engineered today.
- + -

Re: YAHOO! GAME CONSOLE.

When end users is running a game on a console,
There are a HUGE amount of files to be DOWNLOADED,

from the SERVER side to the CLIENT side.

A files download manager must be provided using A.I. 2.0

A HYPERVISOR TYPE 3 ( Firmware ) to cope with the x86
instructions as the EXYNOS 2022 is a RISC, therefore
the proper x86 need to be translated to the RISC instructions
before be executed, to reach this goal, we will need a

DEDICATED LIBRARY to convert from x86 to the RISC.

A hypervisor enables the host hardware to operate multiple
VMs independent of each other and share abstracted resources

among those VMs.

Virtualization with a hypervisor increases a data

center's efficiency compared to physical workload hosting.

YES! We need the 'HYPERVISOR TYPE 3' at the CLIENT side because
there are a lot of legacy x86 and this could run in a

motherboard with two RISC processors using the proper library.

It is a TYPE 3 that mix TYPE 1 and TYPE 2 features as
this must cope with old x86 legacy from 8088, 80286,
80386, 80486, Pentium, Pentium II, Pentium III, Pentium IV,
i3, i5, i7 and the obvius logic way is using a CLIENT
HYPERVISOR TYPE 3 because there are a DEDICATED LIBRARY
that is used to do translations from an old x86 instruction
to the proper RISC instruction that could be executed

with the EXYNOS 2022 processors.

In the MAINFRAME SIDE, SERVER, To do this the A.I. 2.0
is needed to identify the kind of instruction that will
be run. And as we have two kinds of instructions that are

RISC or x86 to be executed.

I suggest to use the two first bits to classify the kind

of the source code that was the origination.

If the first bit is zero 0 to this is an old x86 instruction
and it need translation to the RISC and the HYPERVISOR TYPE
3 must recognize it and distribute the task to a translator

program to convert to the RISC PATTERN in order to be executed.

if the first bit is one 1 to this is a RISC instruction
so this could be running as if it is RISC and this is a RISC
processor, there are RISC x RISC, and the library is of a

kind dedicated to the RISC ONLY.

00 = x86 instructions set -- PC Legacy --
01 = x86 instructions previously converted to any RISC from APPLE
10 = RISC from any else kind of RISC processor that is not SAMSUNG

11 = RISC from EXYNOS 2022 and could run as EXYNOS 2022 native.

The CLUSTERS in the [SERVER SIDE] can convert x86 from 00 to 01
from PC x86 to an 'APPLE RISC' using a previous processing in

the SERVER SIDE, and send it away to the CLIENT side.

Also the LIBRARIES of the [SERVER SIDE] is so so so so so much
more BIG than our small 2 TB of any SSD storage. The CLIENT
HYPERVISOR needs to recognize as soon as possible the kind
of the code that is entering and do LOCAL CONVERSION to the

EXYNOS 2022 could perform and execute "RUN IT"...

Please don't lost the trolley of the history that is

now passing away.

Please provide a motherboard for two EXYNOS 2200 processors.

Features are as follows:

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13673-020-00258-2/MediaObjects/13673_2020_258_Fig2_HTML.png?as=webp

==

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13673-020-00258-2/MediaObjects/13673_2020_258_Fig4_HTML.png?as=webp

==

Who knows 'do the time' and do not hope that it happens.

Researchers believe that AI will play a defining role
in the IoTs and IoBNTs driven world.
The potential shift from 5G to the 6G will be

to determine an efficient way to transmit data.

Softwarization is the term used for the set of interfaces
and protocols which can allow the network to be configured

in software by decoupling the control and user plane.

The user plan usually consists of a set of distributed
and stateless routing tables at which packet switching

is performed at a very high speed.

These tables are updated by the centralized control plan
which maintains the end-to-end routing information for

multiple services.

Data and control management operations are

exchanged between the service consumer and the SDN provider.

SDN provider ultimately forwards the required
service to the service consumer. These services are
controlled by the service consumer by taking acting

on these virtual resources.

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13673-020-00258-2/MediaObjects/13673_2020_258_Fig5_HTML.png?as=webp

==

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13673-020-00258-2/MediaObjects/13673_2020_258_Fig6_HTML.png?as=webp

==
6G communication network will cover a large bandwidth

ranging from 3GHz to 60GHz.

Therefore, to enable communication, at any frequency in
this 6G band, the complexity of the hardware circuitry

is increased.

For each, the communication, antenna, RF filters,

amplifiers have to be designed accordingly.

To cover all the 6G band in next-generation communication
systems, multiple RF and signal processing chains would
be required, which would ultimately increase the

chip size and hardware.

Therefore, a lot of focus needs to be paid to

the field of open research.

FYI.

The 6G standards by international standardisation bodies
is shown in Fig. 1 with respect to the vision of 6G

wireless networks.

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13673-020-00258-2/MediaObjects/13673_2020_258_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp

==
International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication
sector (ITU-R) issued the requirements of International
Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020 Standard) in 2015

for the 5G network standards.

At the same time, 3GPP issued R13 for 5G standards.
It is predicted that ITU will complete the standardization
of 6G (ITU-R IMT-2030) by the end of the year 2030,
whereas 3GPP will finalize its standardization of 6G

in R23.

ITU has established a focus workgroup for exploring

the system technologies for B5G/6G systems in July 2018.

https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13673-020-00258-2/MediaObjects/13673_2020_258_Fig3_HTML.png?as=webp

==