PLEASE-PLEASE-PLEASE, go back to the "Yahoo Finance Classic" display. Biggest fault of good management/managers is fixing what isn't broken.
PLEASE-PLEASE-PLEASE, go back to the "Yahoo Finance Classic" display. Biggest fault of good management/managers is fixing what isn't broken.

-
Brad commented
how do we get classic yahoo finance back?
-
Rob K commented
How to get classic view back? before I would scroll down to the bottom right and find a link to switch back to classic.
-
Jerry Howeld commented
I agree. The new page is terrible. I want the option to use the classic view.
I have a 3" gap of unused space at the top of the page. Who designed this format? My cat could have utlized space better than this. Maybe I'll go back to MSN Money? -
Richard Egan commented
Today 12/18/24 the page is back to the 'new' format, terrible layoutAND there is NO return to classic at the bottom . PLEASE CORRECT . new format is like somebody threw a egg at the wall and said this is good.........
-
Jamie Estep commented
Finding another service if this is finally permanent. We've been saying for months how bad the new version is especially on large monitors. Not that any tech company cares about actual user experience, but lord, take 5 minutes on a 22in plus 4k monitor and see if you can tolerate the new disaster...
-
Anonymous commented
Please give us the option to go back. Who ever did this should be fired.
-
Jeff Laganelli commented
Is classic view option is no longer available?
-
E Craig commented
Why did you change something we all liked by throwing a bunch of garbage on the wall of the web page?
-
John Smith commented
Due to these unwelcome and unpredictable "improvements" and "upgrades", I never subscribe to any non-free online services under any circumstances. Important data is best kept offline using stable, time-tested software. Good luck with your ongoing planned obsolescence - just keep adding more useless visual effects and emojis, making the platform increasingly bulky, energy-hungry, and slow. Failure is guaranteed.
-
Pablo Gomez commented
I agree .100%.Please do not touch what works
-
Gab commented
Congratulations on the disaster. Perfect!!! I would immediately fire all the people who participated in it. Where did the mind and eyes go?
A 15-year-old boy did it during a school break? Without anyone testing it in real practice.
This is not user friendly. This is all against the user. There is no other option but to throw it in the trash. And turn back on the old version.
It's not just about a side pointer that has nothing to look for.
Both indentation and spacing are bad.
Visibility is bad.
The optical orientation is bad.
Everything is against the user.
When someone has more tickers, it is necessary to wait for loading while scrolling.
Everything is counterintuitive. Nothing can be found.
What could be set before is no longer possible.
It is necessary to move to the sides.
It is necessary to scroll up / down.
What could be seen before cannot be seen now.
What could be done before with the settings is now not possible.
The daily increase % shows twice.
I don't see a chart for the year there.
It's a lot of mistakes.
-
B S commented
fragmented & unusable... hello marketwatch
-
TR commented
It’s so bad. Impossible to see all the columns in the pane without scrolling. The charts are slow to render and difficult to compare stocks on a chart. What a mess.
-
Kevin Bushbaker commented
Yahoo, PLEASE, allow users to go back to the old view. Why Why Why? John Oliver said you are literally run by untrained monkeys throwing your own s*** at each other all day. All joking aside, what could you possibly have been thinking here? It is a breathtakingly bad move...
-
Gab commented
I don't understand why you destroy a brand built over years like this.
-
Matt Nelson commented
Can we cram three more webpages worth of data into the landing page? I'd really like to have 50 article summaries and would love to need to use a magnifying glass to see my followed funds...
-
stan tzikas commented
If it ain't broke, don't fix it, MORONS
-
David Wineberg commented
It's not just the format, it's now the data, too: GSBD shows a bid of 12.74, and an ask of 3000 shares at 0.00, eur/usd and cad/usd both show the bid HIGHER than the ask, and both quote only two decimal places, when all the action takes place with four. HG=F simply does not update ever, unless you refresh the whole page.This service is falling apart before our eyes.
-
NALINI BAVDA commented
Go back to classic view
-
Peter P commented
agree go back to classic ASAP