give the opportunity to use the old version, it is more convenient.

-
George W Wharton commented
I agree with all the negative comments. The "decisioners" must be invested in AI that is expected to take over Yahoo Finance after your former subscribers abandon the frustration of the new version.
-
Lonnie D Tanner commented
Not Happy! Chart? What Chart? Every time I goto my main portfolio I get;
"There was an error while loading your portfolio chart. Please try again." -
Campari Knoepffler commented
I am sure you are well aware of the disaster the new Yahoo Finance is. You should make your employees use it so that they can see for themselves how glitchy, slow, and inconvenient it is compared with the old site. Some of the latest glitches I encountered:
1) The default chart has a 1min interval, which is useless, and I don't not how to change it.
2) Some sort of analyst rating chart is being superimposed on the stock chart and I can't get rid of it.
3) Very glitchy, the charts default to all sort of weird settings and I have to manually change them every time I use the chart,
4) Account $ totals on the home page are a bad idea (even if you can hide the numbers), eliminate this or have the option to eliminate the box. -
John Michaels commented
Something is critically wrong with the reply system. When I reply to a community member on the board it sends me to an article I have never read or have any interest in. Doesnt allow me to reply to the community member. Super frustrating and need to resolve or I move back to Reddit.
-
Brent Bruschke commented
Congratulations, you've improved Yahoo Finance by making it worse. It's slow, not as user friendly, harder to navigate (more clicks required), and just doesn't work properly. Investors want a simple, functional site with good information. I don't know one person that didn't like the old version; it was perfect.
-
TP commented
Listen to your users, the new UX is unforuantely terrible and the old version was good as it was.
-
chas commented
How can I change the dollar cost average and lot size of my buy without adding a lot? How do I adjust the dollar cost average without erasing the stock and starting over?
-
chas commented
Twenty plus years with the classic. Yahoo has destroyed my business with this change. I am about to give up hope
-
Jeff Mewborne commented
PLEASE LET US SWITCH BACK TO THE CLASSIC VERSION!
-
John C. Scharrett commented
CLEARLY no one at Yahoo Finance gives a S**t. Also clear that this is just a site for people to vent and is not read. There have been NO improvements based on the "opportunity" to provide feedback. You all suck.
-
Michael LoPiccolo commented
I agree - please give the option to revert to the previous version
-
Tom Hearne commented
I do not understand how someone is always fiddling with something that works well. The result is usually something that is worse. This is again the case.
I have used the following data for years (over 20) from Yahoo Finance. I will use an example with AAPL stock:Stock Symbol Close Change 52 Week Low 52 Week High
AAPL 236 -1.59 164.08 260.1I would copy this line of data and many others and paste it in a spreadsheet (Excel), so the result
would be one line of data for each row.Now when I do this, I get the following:
AAPL236 -1.59 164.08 260.1
Very tedious to now get all of the date "lined up." Why is this not on one row as it has been since the beginning? Will just simply have to find another data source to do the simple thing I wish to do.
Maybe there is a simple way to accomplish what I wish? If so, please let me know, the alternative is to go somewhere else. Thank you!
Tom Hearne
Followup to the above comments. Now 3/23/25--Many thanks for changing this back to the way it was.
I can now copy lines of stock quotes, prices, etc. and enter them as it has been for over 20 years. Thank you!Tom Hearne
-
Marquette Vision commented
I am a fan of the classic view, and find the new version to be a big disappointment. Still waiting for the site to change my opinion, but my patience is rapidly going elsewhere! I do like Stock Analysis which is visually easy to use, and has up to date information before yahoo and more in depth analysis then yahoo finance. My only disappointment with Stock Analysis is that the Statistics are not as concise as yahoo which causes me to view several sites to achieve the information that I desire, and there is no lots available for each stock trade--just average cost basis. Which ever site either paid or free version gives this to me like the old Classic view is where I will reside.
-
Stan L Soles commented
Barchart and Stock Analysis are very good sites,
-
Jim Rugg commented
give the opportunity to use the old version, it is more convenient.
-
Jim Rugg commented
Not Much I can add. I've used a Yahoo Portfoilio for over 20 years and the new change really sucks, It is aweful slow . I hate the indexes along side. Today I can get the lower scroll bar to slide over to post markets. Please bring back the old version
-
nico lala commented
Again an other example of developers wanting to develop something new, but are not using the platform. Please listen to what users want. Then try to improve it. This new platform is clearly going
in the wrong direction.Please, fell free to read this note a second time.
-
Tryg last name commented
Truly a convoluted mess, Its apparent that Yahoo is deaf to their users and now many former users.
Maybe thats their plan, disenfranchise and loose all their viewers. They are genius. -
John C. Scharrett commented
These comments obviously go into a vacuum. Apparently, the behavioral psychologists at Yahoo are better then their developers. I think it is pretty clear that this new version is terrible, it is practically unworkable and barely usable. Thanks for the memories Yahoo...
BTW - If you give the option to create a custom portfolio table, why is now impossible to get back to that custom view once you've done a temporary sort by one of the columns? BTW #2, now sorting by a column takes 3x as long .... what are you people doing???
-
Michael Cassady commented
Congratulations of a negative sort in that you took a perfectly fine finance page and turned it into a rat's nest