Removing the ability to chat was a wise move as the chats were rather toxic to say the least. However it would be nice for a place to leave comments on articles which can be reviewed before being shared/posted. Purely in the interests of having a healthy discussion of a readers opinions and views on an article. I normally don’t comment on some of the controversial posts or on articles that I personally do not agree with. This is not meant to be a toxic comment, but your article - 'Nobody likes it' - Gino D'Acampo bans British Christmas staple from his table - has niggled me a wee bit.
https://uk.style.yahoo.com/nobody-likes-gino-dacampo-bans-085324958.html
What an idiotic and stupid person Gino D'Acampo is. I am not sure where he lives, apart from his closed mind. If he thinks no one likes turkey can he explain why the turkey farms have such a high turn over, and why the supermarkets often sellout their turkeys, chickens and ducks. Who is he to rename a religious holiday, from Christmas to Fishmas, what a stupid man he is. By this article I would say that he is almost in the same camp as Gordon Ramsey.
If he wants to force his family to eat a certain way and deny them a certain privilege, that is up to him and may be fine for his family and him. OK I accept that these proclaimed celebrity chefs can fry an egg in some elitist oil, dress it in something different and serve it as some out of the ordinary, and yes it may taste nicer than your average egg fried in lard. Instead why don't all these proclaimed celebrity chefs, show the viewers how to cook a Christmas turkey, chicken, etc. in a healthy way, make the most of the whole bird including the carcass and how to do this on a budget and using typical oils and condiments that the average low budget family has in their cupboards. In many of their programmes they will use an oil that not everyone stocks, and to cook that meal, can only add more cost to a low budget family.