FIX YOUR COMMENT CENSOR ALGORITHM
Whatever bots you use to censor comments are broken. I've been trying to post a benign comment that doesn't attack anyone, doesn't use any profanity, and doesn't use any of the other stupid words you Yahoos have deigned to censor (because you're retards, one of the words you censor). Yet you will not post it, you keep deleting the comment. It is incredibly frustrating and one of the reasons why I'm about to drop Yahoo and never visit your sites again.
mE
shared this idea
241 comments
-
Aldo Cray
commented
Tagged me three times for "brown bag" in a comment on wine pouches.
-
mE
commented
*uck you Yahoo. Today you censored me from making a completely tame comment about Renee Zellweger's old-lady legs. Seriously? You people are *ucking hacks.
-
Al
commented
I write comments under your news articles, hit "post", then "newest" to look for them but whatever happens, as soon as I hit "post" I never see them again.
-
keith james oliver
commented
Yeah, last I remembered freedom of speech shall not be infringed but you morons have not learned that one as of yet. quit the censorship or I will quit you!
-
mE
commented
Numerous comments censored today for no reason. Once again, *uck you Yahoo.
-
Anonymous
commented
HEY YAHOO, F U & UR comment censoring
-
Timothy Hess
commented
Lies! And here we are, you closing any comments to my claim and you ask me, what's wrong? You guys are ******* ********. Look at the suggestions below and tell me you are doing your ******* jobs!
-
mE
commented
*uck you Yahoo. Today you censored this comment: "That's funny considering Cheadle's body language through the entire interview screamed "don't touch me and I don't want to be around this chick.""
Please explain how that violates your terms. Oh that's right you can't. You're just useless propagandists and liars.
-
Anonymous
commented
You use words in your titles, but if you repeat that word in a post ... it gets deleted.
-
mE
commented
*uck you Yahoo.
-
mE
commented
Got censored five times today for comments that did not violate TOS. *uck you Yahoo.
-
mE
commented
Got censored again today for a comment that does not violate TOS. **ck you Yahoo.
-
mE
commented
Back again to say **ck you Yahoo. Today you censored my comment because it contained the word "nutter." In English slang, this is a way to refer to someone as "crazy." But apparently your algorithms think the word is too close to "******" - a derogatory term for black people? That's the only reason I can fathom for you censoring my comment. **ck you again, by the way.
-
jim jimmy
commented
why are you guys so communist censoring AMERICAN COMMENTS>
-
Anonymous
commented
STICK YOUR COMMENT CENSORING IN YOUR ***
-
Anonymous
commented
Take your rediculous comment posting censorship & stick it in your ***
-
mE
commented
OK Yahoo, every time you censor one of my comments I'm coming here and just posting two words: *uck you.
-
mE
commented
Yet more censorship today you *ucking *untbags.
-
mE
commented
I'm starting to think Yahoo doesn't want me to use the word "black" for any reason whatsoever.
-
mE
commented
Seriously this is *ucking stupid now. I posted this to a story on the black hole photograph: "Not exactly HD quality, no? Folks, if you want to imagine what this black hole actually looks like, watch the movie Interstellar. The CGI representation of Gargantua, the supermassive black hole in that film, was built using the calculations of physicist Kip Thorn, who has studied black holes for something near 50 years now. In other words, it's a science-based representation of what a gigantic black whole should look like if it is still "active", that is, pulling in material (stars, planets, gases). The only reason we can "see" this black whole in M87 is because it is still pulling in matter."
So Yahoo, care to explain to me how that comment violates your terms? You useless *ucking *sshats?