14th rankedGathering feedback · 220 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Bug or Error · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Tried to post this comment today but you keep censoring it:
"Why don't you get one of your rich friends like Jeff Bezos to pay it off? Why are you going to put the responsibility on taxpayers like me?"
What in that comment violates your terms of service, you useless *&%$-wads? Two years now this has been in the top 20 feedback suggestions and you have yet to respond in any way. I hope every last one of you is laid off.
Verizon says you guys at Yahoo are worthless. I'm starting to believe them.
And here I am again to post a comment that doesn't violate terms of service, yet you won't allow me to post.
"Only one side of the story presented here. What's the real story? How much you want to bet his wife (and he himself) got belligerent and arrogant with the flight attendant? But also I think Hasan is a jerk for making his wife continue to wear the headscarf. She doesn't have to if he approves. It's not prescribed in the Koran that women have to wear these things or cover their faces. Those rules were made by "religious scholars" later."
You censoring me because I used the word "jerk"? Seriously? What the **** are we allowed to use? Oh right, your standards are whatever you say they are at the time of asking, and are constantly subject to change, right? ********.
Got censored today for saying "piece of junk." Seriously, Yahoo? Seriously?
And today had this comment censored: "So many people driving today who just get into their bubble and don't pay attention when they drive. Can't tell you how many times someone tells me "Well I guess I accidentally cut this guy off and he just started screaming at me, what a jerk!" NO, YOU ARE THE JERK. YOU DON'T "ACCIDENTALLY" CUT SOMEONE OFF. THAT JUST MEANS YOU WEREN'T PAYING ATTENTION WHEN YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN!"
Please tell me Yahoo, what rule does that comment break? YOU PEOPLE ARE ******* USELESS ******* HACKS AND I HOPE YOUR COMPANY GOES BANKRUPT AND ALL YOU PEOPLE END UP HOMELESS AND BROKE.
Dear Yahoo: when the revolution comes, you folks will be first against the wall. Remember that.
And you censored this comment today: "So now it's racist if white people adopt black children, got it. Let those kids sit in orphanages then. No skin off our backs."
Nothing in that comment violates your terms of service. DO I NEED TO GET A LAWYER TO CALL YOU, YAHOO?
So Yahoo, please tell me what this comment violates in your terms? You *ucking useless (c)unts:
"I'm regularly getting between 32 and 35 MPG in my 2019 Rav4 (non-highway daily commute). The Eco drive option really helps with that, even if it means I'm no jackrabbit off the line. Problem is I end up with everyone else on my tail due to the slower acceleration. But hey, it saves gas. All you punks flying off the start from red light stops are wasting your gas."
Please inform me as to the reason that comment would be censored? Oh right, you can't, because you just make up your comment rules as you go along.
Seriously Yahoo what the ****? Today in a comment, you censored the words "young woman." FIX YOUR IDIOTIC CENSOR BOTS, THEY ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT WORKING CORRECTLY.
******** YAHOO YOU ******* *****. STOP CENSORING MY COMMENTS.
******** Yahoo. Still no response from you fuckheads on any of this. Still no clarification of why comments are censored that don't violate terms of service. ******** and your entire company, Yahoo. I hope Trump throws you and Google and Facebook all to the Anti-Trust wolves.
"Marvel/Disney not casting Daniel Wu for this or anything else honestly is the real crime here. Dan Wu can act, AND he can fight. I was hoping he'd be cast as Spike Spiegel in the Netflix adaptation of Cowboy Bebop, but no they go with John Cho who couldn't pull off a kung fu move without throwing his back out."
HOW DOES THAT VIOLATE YOUR COMMENT GUIDELINES, YAHOO? YOU USELESS *OCKSUCKERS.
ONE YEAR AND THREE DAYS THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN ON YOUR FEEDBACK PAGE AND WE STILL DON'T HAVE EVEN ONE RESPONSE FROM YAHOO.
Dear Yahoo *uckheads: This comment was censored today -
"We will never win a World Cup in my lifetime so honestly I don't give AF about the national team. My club teams will suffice. Go Chelsea, Go Atlanta United!"
How does that break your TOS? Especially since I've used the term "AF" many times before and not been censored?
YOU PEOPLE ARE USELESS *OCKSUCKERS.
Tried to post this comment today: "$100 says they're Muslims."
What exactly is wrong with that comment? How does that break your TOS?
And tried to post this to an article about a bison attack at Yellowstone:
"These people go to Yellowstone and walk on these paths yards from enormous wild animals and they just think it's like the zoo and walk on past like nothing will ever happen. They turn their backs on these animals or let their guard down and this is what happens. I really wish the government would heavily restrict access to that park. These tourists walk around like the animals are cool with it and too many end up like this girl, or worse."
YAHOO, PLEASE INFORM ME AS TO HOW THIS VIOLATES YOUR TOS? TRIED TO POST MULTIPLE TIMES, SYSTEM WILL NOT DO IT.
AND WE HAVE NOW MOVED TO #15 ON THE CHARTS. Still no response from the hacks at Yahoo.
Tried to post this today, got censored, still no explanation from the shitbags at Yahoo:
"I love how apparently everyone on this planet is allowed to come here, demand my tax dollars to pay for their lifestyles, and I'm not allowed to say anything about it lest I be labeled a racist. Then these people get to protest my business and affect my bottom line and they aren't even legal citizens of this country? They'll march down the street waving the flag of whatever hole they came from, and I'm supposed to be the one who steps aside?"
And yet another comment censored for no reason. YAHOO, PLEASE TELL ME HOW THIS VIOLATES YOUR TERMS: "Dear Jay Busbee, cub political reporter: it's not the PGA's job to get involved in politics, nor should they. When companies follow advice like yours they almost always end up worse off. I want to watch sports, not political rallies. I care about how well you can pass a soccer ball, not about the fact that you're a proud lesbian. I care about how well you can putt, not the fact that you're African-American. I don't watch sports to find out what Serena Williams thinks about reparations or how much women get paid. I watch to see her hit tennis balls. If these people won't take the hint, then I guess I'll find other pastimes to spend my money on. Ones that aren't interested in constantly telling me how to vote."
SO HOW IS THAT IN VIOLATION, HUH? OH WHO CARES, YOU WON'T RESPOND ANYWAY YOU USELESS *UCKS. *UCK YOU AND *UCK GOOGLE AND *UCK FACEBOOK TOO. I HOPE TRUMP COMES AT YOU WITH ANTI-TRUST AND PUTS YOU ALL OUT OF A JOB.
So we're coming up on a YEAR that this topic has been "gathering feedback." Perhaps Yahoo could deign to respond? You *ucking *unts.
Dear Yahoo IDIOTS: the word Pea**ck is not a derogatory term, you *ucking idiots.
Are you serious I just got my comment censored on THIS ******* THREAD.
And today I was censored for using the word "peacock" in a comment. So again, fix your algorithms, Yahoo. Peacock is not a dirty word.
And today you censored this comment, Yahoo: "You throw it in their faces for two decades and they eventually decide they're tired of hearing it?"
That's it. That's all I wrote but you will not publish it. Please tell me how that violates your terms of service? CAN I GET A ******* ANSWER FROM ANYONE?
And we're up to the 16th most popular feedback proposal on your site, but still can't get an answer from Yahoo. **** you, you communist hacks.
*uck you Yahoo. Today you censored me from making a completely tame comment about Renee Zellweger's old-lady legs. Seriously? You people are *ucking hacks.
Numerous comments censored today for no reason. Once again, *uck you Yahoo.
*uck you Yahoo. Today you censored this comment: "That's funny considering Cheadle's body language through the entire interview screamed "don't touch me and I don't want to be around this chick.""
Please explain how that violates your terms. Oh that's right you can't. You're just useless propagandists and liars.
*uck you Yahoo.
Got censored five times today for comments that did not violate TOS. *uck you Yahoo.
Got censored again today for a comment that does not violate TOS. **ck you Yahoo.
Back again to say **ck you Yahoo. Today you censored my comment because it contained the word "nutter." In English slang, this is a way to refer to someone as "crazy." But apparently your algorithms think the word is too close to "******" - a derogatory term for black people? That's the only reason I can fathom for you censoring my comment. **ck you again, by the way.
OK Yahoo, every time you censor one of my comments I'm coming here and just posting two words: *uck you.
Yet more censorship today you *ucking *untbags.
I'm starting to think Yahoo doesn't want me to use the word "black" for any reason whatsoever.
Seriously this is *ucking stupid now. I posted this to a story on the black hole photograph: "Not exactly HD quality, no? Folks, if you want to imagine what this black hole actually looks like, watch the movie Interstellar. The CGI representation of Gargantua, the supermassive black hole in that film, was built using the calculations of physicist Kip Thorn, who has studied black holes for something near 50 years now. In other words, it's a science-based representation of what a gigantic black whole should look like if it is still "active", that is, pulling in material (stars, planets, gases). The only reason we can "see" this black whole in M87 is because it is still pulling in matter."
So Yahoo, care to explain to me how that comment violates your terms? You useless *ucking *sshats?
******** Yahoo. ******** and die.
Just ******** Yahoo. When the revolution comes we're going to line you folks up against a wall.
Tried to post this to an article about NASA taking a picture of a black hole, but was censored:
"Well, Gargantua was created for the film using Kip Thorn's equations, so according to the math, that's pretty much what a supermassive black hole (that is still active, i.e. still pulling in matter) should look like. If Sag A is still pulling in matter, it should look something like Gargantua."
So tell me Yahoo, WTF is wrong with my comment that you would censor it? Still waiting for an explanation from you hack *ssholes.
Posted to an article about Chicago prosecutor Foxx: "Whatever. She let Smollett go because the Obama's are promising to raise money for Foxx's re-election (and to help her politically when/if she runs for higher office, though I can't imagine that's an option anymore)."
Censored. Please explain to me how this violates your ToS?
Still no response from the dirtbags at Yahoo.
Posted today to an article on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez:
"Her naivete is going to get her censured in Congress and possibly charged with criminal campaign finance violations based on what I've seen about her re-direction of her campaign donations to people like her boyfriend."
Censored. PLEASE TELL ME HOW THIS VIOLATES THE COMMENTING TERMS? DO I NEED TO ASK A LAWYER ABOUT THIS?
Tried to post to an article on Trump impeachment: "Please try it. You will guarantee his re-election."
That's it. That's all I said. So please Yahoo, tell me how that comment violates your terms?
I just posted this comment and I don't see where the terms of service were violated, so what's your problem Yahoo? Comment you censored: "She's going to put people on a list, in true commie form." How does that comment violate your terms? Hint: it doesn't. You're just censoring comments you don't like and lying about it.
Tried to post this to an article about ***** Kylie Jenner:
"None of your money is earned either. People pay you to take pictures of you and use your name, and that's how you make money. You contribute nothing of value to society."
Censored. Tell me for what exactly, Yahoo? How does that comment violate your rules?
LOL I just posted the comment "Nobody cares." Censored. You're such a ***ing joke, Yahoo.
In an article about NFL 'Rooney Rule' I posted this and it was censored/removed: "This dumb rule has not led to more black/minority head coaches, so what is the point of it?"
Posted to an article on Ocasio-Cortez: "They're worshiping her the same way they worshiped Obama. The difference is Obama is actually intelligent. Cortez is just talking out of her rear end most of the time."
Censored. Please explain your policy, Yahoo.
So just found out I can't even use the word "dirtbag" or Yahoo will straight up delete my comment. Seriously?
Posted to an article on Ocasio-Cortez: "This chick is just Cynthia McKinney 2.0. You know what ole' Cynthia is doing now? She bought herself an online Ph.D. and teaches at a university in Bangladesh. Primarily because she's been shut out of all the money-making race hustles in her hometown Atlanta."
Comment deleted. Why? No profanity. How does this violate your TOS? ********.
Posted to an article about a model getting groped: "She's a racist." Censored/erased. For what reason, Yahoo? Still no response. ******** people.
Posted to an article about e. coli: "Or maybe people could spend five friggin minutes washing your produce after you buy it and not be lazy idiots." Censored. Why? Why is that comment censored? Still no response from the Yahoo braintrust.
STILL NO RESPONSE FROM THE LIBERAL HACKS AT YAHOO.
OH MY GOD THEY'RE EVEN CENSORING THE COMMENTS ON THIS FEEDBACK SUGGESTION.
And now I find out that you censor the word Crook? Seriously Yahoo? Crook is a profanity according to you?
Posted to an article about a kid's birthday:
"To be honest, when I was a kid I avoided bringing my friends to my house. My dad would yell at us a lot and had no qualms about yelling at my friends too, so we avoided my house. I never invited my friends for "birthday" parties which were just excuses for my dad's family to get together and drink. I'd hang around for cake and presents and then go find my friends in the neighborhood and let the adults be jackwagons by themselves."
Censored. Why did you censor this comment, Yahoo? Give me a ******* answer.
Posted to an article on transgender kid:
"No, you are an abused boy with a crazy mother who wanted a daughter and got you instead."
Tell me why this was censored, Yahoo. I WANT A ******** ANSWER.
Still no answer Yahoo, and yet this is now one of the Top 100 feedback suggestions. But I guess this will just sit here for three years while you ignore it.
Your algorithms do understand the difference between (s)ucker and the other word starting with an F, right? If not, then you guys are pretty worthless.
Posted to a story about Ariana Grande and Pete Davidson:
"Translation: I've gotten all the positive PR I can out of this, so long ******."
Censored. Give me an explanation, Yahoo. Still waiting.
******* ANSWER ME YAHOO. I WANT A ******** ANSWER.
Posted to a story about dumb girls going to a pool:
"Why is this a story? Who cares?"
Censored. Why? Give me a ******* answer Yahoo.
I posted this to an article about Stacy Abrams and was censored:
"Stop lying, all of these people can vote with a provisional ballot. Nobody is being suppressed."
Why did you censor this comment? Give me a ******* answer.
I posted this to an article on Selena Gomez and it was censored.
"She has anxiety because her dwindling Disney and music money won't fund her lifestyle, and she hasn't yet found a rich ****** to marry her yet."
WHY DID YOU CENSOR THIS COMMENT? Give me a ******** answer.
I tried to post this on an article about Avril Lavigne and Lyme Disease:
"And this is why I bathe in DEET when I go backcountry hiking/camping. No ticks on this boi." Then I changed it to ""And this is why I bathe in DEET when I go backcountry hiking/camping. No ticks on me."
Yahoo censored both comments. Explain that to me, Yahoo.mE shared this idea ·
Our Engineering team is looking into this. If you could let us know what about the “show less” option isn’t working we would appreciate it. Please provide specific publishers if possible.
*uck you Yahoo, all of your useless employees should go drown themselves in the ocean.
These Yahoo mother*uckers did the same thing to me, merged my idea post with yours. Getting really sick of this shite.
******** Yahoo, you won't fix anything, your company is run by ******* socialist Democrats, and you can all get ******.
At all. This function is supposed to allow us to limit publishers showing up in our feed. It doesn't work, period. Every publisher I mark to "show less" continues to show up in my news feed multiple times a day. What ******* good is the feature if it doesn't work at all?
STOP MERGING MY POST WITH THIS. ADDRESS THE GOD DAMN ISSUE, YAHOO.
"Please provide specific publishers if possible." ALL OF THEM. THE FEATURE DOESN'T WORK FOR ANY PUBLISHER YOU ACTIVATE IT ON, NOT A SINGLE ONE.
******** Yahoo it's not like you ******* care anyway
13th rankedGathering feedback · 19 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Editorial Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
10th rankedGathering feedback · 26 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Editorial Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
17th rankedGathering feedback · 28 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Yahoo Mail · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
135th rankedGathering feedback · 2 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Customer Support · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
78th rankedGathering feedback · 2 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Editorial Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
60th rankedGathering feedback · 24 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Feature Suggestion · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
12th rankedGathering feedback · 7 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Editorial Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
69th rankedGathering feedback · 20 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Editorial Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
53rd rankedGathering feedback · 3 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Feature Suggestion · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
18th rankedGathering feedback · 27 comments · Yahoo Homepage » My Yahoo · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
9th rankedGathering feedback · 97 comments · Yahoo Homepage » My Yahoo · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
16th rankedGathering feedback · 41 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Customer Support · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
30th rankedGathering feedback · 86 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Ads Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
7th rankedGathering feedback · 112 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Feature Suggestion · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Just dropping another comment to say that the "See less from this publisher" function doesn't work. At all.
55th rankedGathering feedback · 10 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Editorial Feedback · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →