part was in the results. Their was also a different opinion from a res.group
from Stanford. We are in a very dangerous place right now and they only
most important consideration right now is safety and when the article
makes a statement like we might be too cautious-we can not be too
cautious right now, we have to be hypercautious or we will never get
this virus under control. Who ordered this study? Why were they picked to do the study, who is paying for this study. Before this country
starts to make decisions based on this study we need a lot of answers
about that study. So we keep the kids home for 6 more months maybe.
The only priority that this country can have right now is STOP THE VIRUS AND STOP IT NOW. tHE VACCINES HAVE BEEN SCREWED
UP FOR ONE REASON AND ONE REASON ALONE. Trump is so
****** off right now, we were suppose to have vaccines for 20 million
people in stock pile - funny thing-it isn't there. Has anyone asked him
where they are or where the money is? Why is every one afraid to ask
him a question? WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY.

throw shade on Biden before he has a chance to even take his oath. Are
you a Trumper? Are you angry that the bigoted racist did not win the
election, it sounds like that to me. Why would you feel that way? I'm a
little tired of every one not even giving Biden a chance, he has not taken
his oath of office yet and it sounds like you want to fight. If that is what
you want take it some where else, we are done with fighting to be taken out of the line of fire,being blamed for everything that has gone
wrong. You and Trump can take it somewhere else.

that there was an anti-government rebellion going on in this country - if this is what this is. In 1960's the young people of this country rose up and protested but we were protesting the Viet Nam war. There was nothing to
do with harming our family, friends, or our communities. Not a lot of what went on created thousands of people dying because of it so it was hard to run what is happening now up against the 60's. We were
fighting against the death of our soldiers being killed and maimed and
I remember not as many people died in the Viet Nam War compared
to the almost 400,000 people who have died from the virus and the counting is not over yet. So this is strictly apples and oranges.So it is something to think about - what is it that is being protested, do we know??

empathetic feelings for their families, friends, and the community at large
does do it, these are not kids, start treating them like adults. Dr. Fauci
came out yesterday and says the virus is out of control so this is no longer a decision about one thing or another, PEOPLE ARE DYING AT
AN ALARMING RATE. This is exactly like a war, let's start acting like
it is a war. Has anyone ever read an article about the Civil War? It seems to me that 500,000 people died in that war. This virus is more deadly than the Viet Nam War was, so we need to face this like any other war, I have been hollering that the American people needed to grow up but maybe the government needs to grow up. What if this was a country attacking us like this virus is, what would we do. Let's stop playing games anymore, let's put up our weapons and start shooting.
What would we do? Let's do it.

She represents everything we have been fighting against since before we
got to vote. We do not want to walk behind a husband/man and we do not
want a husband/man or a government making decisions for us when it
comes to our physical beings or anything else.Organized religion in the
world has always tried to keep us in a place that we would have a husband rule our lives so it has been a long struggle to obtain our rights since our government has been made up mostly by White males. It is time and it is changing, let's not throw roadblocks up to these acheivements.

That works for the Wall St, Journal because I have written a couple of
comments about this magazine. This article coming out of the WSJ is not
surprising to me because they are strictly a Republican rag. And the whole reason I have written lately about this mags writing because to me it has gotten an edge I have never noticed before. It has always had the GOP leanings but now it has taken on a nastiness it didn't have before and I attribuate to being a Trump mag and supporter. Since Trump has been president the Republican supporters have taken on that ragged edge and I do not like it and it is not necessary
in my opinion but it is apparent they find it necessary to something I
feel comes from free. You know like a rattlesnake only striking when they feel in danger. This is what is apparent coming out of the WSJ
in recent times. I read that the writters of the other WSJ that covers the financial side of the paper have even asked the Editors of a way they
could separate the two because they were not liking the tone the WSJ
was taking. So about Jill Biden-it was apparent that the piece was meant with disrespect and this nasty edginess, it is not appealing to the people who read the WSJ but it does appeal to the "BASE' that they are now being called. It is a distinction where Trump's :"BASE" IS
noticed and it also appears it is the group of people who include the
THE PROUD BOYS, WHITE SUPREMIST, and the Q-ANON'S and lately I have noticed that they are also including what I call the 'KOOL-
AID BRICADE". So if this is how they strike back like a rattlesnake to
shoow disrespect to a woman that they do not know, at lease, we will
understand what context they represent.