Perfectly fine comments "rejected" because of errors in the algorithm!
I had time and again "comment rejected" for comments that do not break the guidelines in any way.
An example is this comment:
"From the top of my head: Cheaper satellites = cheaper and more efficient ways to monitor crops, droughts, floods, freezing, as well as fires, tidal waves and more. Please check Earth Observation and remote sensing. And that is just ONE of the sectors. This will enable Starlink to make global wifi internet more affordable. Furthermore SpaceX has a couple weeks ago sent into space satellites and instruments from a lot of small companies that could afford to pay 300K$ to send their instruments in space but not the millions other companies were asking."
Please tell me how this comment is a violation of the guidelines at all.
It isn't. Something there seems fishy to the algorithm and the entire comment is rejected without even telling me what the issue word is.
Andrew Pavlides
shared this idea
