Comments - FAIR PLAY - If you are REJECTING then you should ACCEPT - ALL Comments PASS through the SYSTEM
Based upon your guidelines ;
with our guidelines or Terms of Service, and to terminate a Yahoo Account for a violation.
Don't make false statements, defame, or impersonate someone else.
Don't copy and post others' material, trademarks, or intellectual property.
Posting HTML, viruses, or other malicious code is a violation of the Terms of Service.
Comments shouldn't harass, abuse, or threaten anyone's personal safety or property.
Don't post profanity, obscenities, abusive language, or otherwise objectionable content.
Protect privacy. Don't post phone numbers, email or mailing addresses, credit card information, etc.
We are not responsible or liable in any way for comments posted by our users.
Please tell me which of the following Comments should be removed and why?
1)Based upon all that has been happening to and with you in the past 2 or 3 years, I seriously began to think that maybe it was time to take another look at the reasons for the conservatorship you are under. You seemed very down to earth in doing your Las Vegas residency and from all we have seen you have been seemingly stable. After watching this story unfold in the past 2 o 3 weeks, I believe that it might be prudent to continue the conservatorship with maybe someone else who is not your family in charge as well as some rules the court should be able to decide in order to keep the best for you in mind. You seem to "running off the rails" about many things that make very little sense to people other than you. It isn't worth any more time. You are still reading fairy tales. (I do wonder about " m f fairy tale. Did I miss any X rated tales?) If by stopping dancing, you are referring to your changing outfits, positioning the camera for a max cleavage shot and then twirling around til your dizzy, by all means STOP. Other than that all I can say is bye bye. Can you say bye bye?
2)The face of fascism: With a certain subject use it to divide the population even if it means killing some of them. Spew the propaganda geared toward the weak minded who are incapable of thinking for themselves to make decisions in their lives even if that person's life depends on it. Authoritarian governments love the uneducated particularly those who are too lazy to read. People like Trump with a fascist conman attitude love those types of people. Fascism here in America as supported by the republican party. Trump the admirer of Adolf Hitler. The GOP Fascist Party. To kill and sacrifice people with the help of social media allowing the spread of deadly destructive harmful propaganda. The republicans say it is an infringement upon one's rights to not get the covid vaccine so I guess that gives somebody the right to chose the possibility of ending their life by not getting the vaccine and of course with the potential to spread it to others.
You allowed 2) to be published on 7/18/2021
As far as 1) is concerned you rejected on 7/19/2021
I would like to know the reason for the rejection of 1)
- No one made false statements, defame, or impersonate someone else
- Did not copy and post others' material, trademarks, or intellectual property
- Posted no Code or HTML
- Did not post profanity, obscenities, abusive language, or otherwise objectionable content (yet commented on the story YOU published)
- Did not post phone numbers, email or mailing addresses, credit card information, etc.
and of course (the best one) -->
- We are not responsible or liable in any way for comments posted by our users
If YOU are not responsible then why do you even bother to reject or allow? and why don't you do both,
Who at openweb.com took away the my 1st Amendment rights yet the night before allowed someone to make remarks that certainly a heck of a lot closer to being libelous then mine.
If you allow one (rejection or removal) then you need to change to a FAIR PLAY SYSTEM - all comments are submitted and then allowed or rejected.
I doubt you might even know what the reason for rejecting one and allowing the other Yet it shows that you are not allowing for Fairmindedness. You are in effect letting us know that you are not allowing the right of Free Speech.