Don't you think that it is about time we stop with the add-on to any candidate that was
enorsed by the former and change the narrative by saying this or that
candidate won the race to the primary. He/she was endorsed by the
former and won the race in spite of that. It is beginning to be more clear
that his enorsements have been piece meal so I really think we can
take that away from the candidates that won in spite of being endorsed
by a president that was impeached twice and is looking good for an
indictment for the horrors he brought to the honor of the presidency.
Will we ever live this down as a country?
325th
ranked
Lyla Wickstrum
shared this idea