Personal supervision on articles comments
I don't know how comment rejection works, but seems they are not performed by humans, but by some clicking technology. The following comment was rejected from the article titled "20 Specific Questions I Have For Japan, A Country And Culture That I've Fallen In Love With (But Still Don't Quite Fully Understand) ":
"Seems to me the author is highly opinionated and a bit judgemental. I'm not asian, not even close, but none of the things she points seem a matter of concern to me. Well, maybe the drunk guys on the streets. Also seems that she is intersecting the "good" things to have a balance when she points at what she considers weird or wrong. Japanese have a high sense of colective civism. That is great for any society. Remember when a whole group (dozens) of japanese fans cleaned the stands they used at the olympics? If that isn't order and common sense I don't know what is. We all could use a bit of it, instead of waving the "freedom flag" all the time."
Now, you tell me how this comment violates the guidelines. Be watchfull of extremist (especially right-wing) who are red-flagging comments they don't like, simply out of their highly prejudiced minds.
Luis Coll
shared this idea
