There is a small but important typo at the beginning of "The history of Coca-Cola" article. It states that the Coca-Cola company was formed in 1986 which is obviously incorrect by 100 years. Also there needs be more research/evidence/objection done on the Pepsi-Coke challenge. They still have this challenge out there today at times, myself doning it a few times and as a daily Coca-Cola consumer I know that each time the test has been rigged. The Pepsi was cold and fresh, where the Coca-Cola was warm flat and tasted as if even more was done to it. I knew they had done somthing and could tell that the cold better tasting of the 2 was Pepsi, so I intentionally chose the warm, flat pop to just see their response, and it clearly was the first time anyone had chosen "that" as the better of the 2. I say "that" in the last sentence instead of Coca-Cola, because that was not just an unfair test, it was rigged. I don't know if Coca-Cola has challenged the test, having it done in a controlled environment but like I said the few times I've done this so called proof that Pepsi is better it was totally a scam. Now I will drink Pepsi and often do if it is whats available, and I've also drank then side by side, them both being great products, I definitely prefer Coca-Cola, to me Pepsi has not as pleasant after taste. I'm just saying somthing is up and should be challenged if it hasn't been.