stop pushing your anti-American agenda
Yahoo editors need to stop pushing their anti-American agenda. They have deleted over 20 posts about this in the last 4 days. Your editors obviously are either illegal aliens or proponents of terrorists.
K H
shared this idea
-
Mark Britton
commented
It has been noted by many commenters that there is clear bias in the AI filters equating to censure of viewpoints, what is okay for one to comment is not allowed to be debated and is immediately flagged. Comments well within community guidelines flagged for failing to push a narrative controlled by Yahoo and dissenting viewpoints are not welcome. One person is allowed to negatively berate one person and AI does not allow a response. The ability to appeal AI decisions has been removed. Quit policing 1st amendment freedoms and allow intelligent conversation between both sides of the coin. And stop disabling the comments when the end result goes against Yahoo sanctioned narratives yours is not the only valid opinion.
-
George Kovka
commented
Let us opt out of things we do not want to see. The lifestyle articles are all rehashes of older stories that clutter up my page.
-
Michael Jooha Danford
commented
Please do not report bias or false information
-
Bryce Fletcher
commented
Fire ALL your Editors and start fresh. Yahoo News is completely incapable of being politically neutral.
-
K Detmar
commented
Your steady stream of leftist propaganda is revolting.
-
Truth HAMMER1
commented
You can tell your CIA handlers. We're not buying none of that ******** y'all keep attempting to spread.
-
Dennis Carrig
commented
Today on 12/27/25 there was an article posted on my homepage from Sportsnaut from writer Matt Johnson titled "Raiders Fire Pete Carroll". That was a blatant lie designed to get clicks. Please do not post any further articles from Sportsnaut on your website. "Journalists" that post intentional lies need to be blocked!! Thanks, Dennis
-
David Tallman
commented
Really would like you be equal, you are not its why I don't advertise with you, i am bummed that this email I have had so long is with your company.
-
S197 PONY
commented
Or you drink koolaid.
-
Diane
commented
A Yahoo user who said he was a military veteran with a purple heart criticized how Israel treats Palestinians, so the Yahoo moderator doxed him. Turns out the military veteran was a man in his 70s living in a dangerous city in California. I reported this to Yahoo customer care, so the Yahoo moderator permanently removed my ability to make any comments on articles and removed from my account all of the comments I had ever made, for over two decades with Yahoo, a total of 2.7 thousand comments which had received 6.9 thousand likes. AOL has an identical format with articles and comments section, except AOL allows conservatives to comment. You don't even need an AOL email account, and every conservative comment I've posted that Yahoo has removed, AOL has no problem with, and allows me to debate politics with other users. Don't stay with Yahoo while they enrich themselves by silencing you.
-
raugh Hammer Raughammer
commented
Yahoo is the MSNBC of the web world. Just steeped in leftist mud.
-
Irene
commented
Today, there was an article titled "Am I a Fetish or the Prettiest Girl In The Room? Why Attractive Black Women trigger White People" The article claimed that the painting "A Pair of Broad Bottoms" had been made to objectify black women, resulting in the expectation that black women have large bottoms and twerk. When I pointed out that the two people in the painting were actual people at the time (Sarah Baartman and Lord Grenville), who looked the way the painting had depicted, the moderator kept removing my comment. Apparently, he can't be bothered to do a google search before determining if my comment is factual enough to be posted.
The same is true for a later comment I tried to give explaining that only a small fraction of white Americans descend from ***** owners. This is a fact that has been attested to by several experts, including Nell Irvine Painter, an African American black studies professor and historian at Princeton University, in her book "The History of White People". Even snopes tries to exaggerate the percentage by pointing out that Adam Rothman, a historian at Georgetown University, claims 7.4% of white Americans owned slaves. Well, that's still a small fraction. Snopes takes issue because this number includes non-*****-holding states, but my comment never claimed to be only about *****-holding states and, further, ***** ownership came nowhere close to the majority of white households even in the South. Some states were worse than others, but I didn't specify I was discussing any specific state. Rather, I clarified I'm discussing white Americans today, the majority of whom, as I said, "do not descend from *****-owners". As widely known as this fact is, when I tried to post it, the Yahoo moderator blocked me from making any more comments and threatened to remove my yahoo account. Am I supposed to lie and claim the bulk of white Americans DO descend from ***** owners? Because your "terms and conditions" claim we're not supposed to lie in the comments section. If we are only allowed to post "facts", how come both your articles and the comments section are filled with leftist inaccuracies that we will have our Yahoo accounts removed for trying to correct?