I chart with 9 SMA and 9 EMA moving averages. In the old interface this required 1 click to open the indicator section, 16 clicks to add additional fields in both sections, and then type/TAB through to enter my moving averages. The new system requires 18 clicks to open the indicators box, 18 clicks to select my desired indicators (9 each SMA and EMA), 18 clicks to place the cursor and replace the average figure, 18 clicks to open the color change selector, 18 clicks to choose a color, and 18 clicks to save the changes.

So.... the "improved" interface has moved a core function of charting from 17 clicks to 108 clicks. How is this supposed to make me more productive? Besides the fact that the settings don't hold from one company to the next, not do they cache in my browser history to be ready the next time I log on and try to use the charts.

The product might look fancy and give extra features, but the goal of modern technology is to increase productivity, not make processes more cumbersome and time-consuming. Your simple charting tools are now as time-consuming as running a Bloomberg Station!

So now I have given the new charts a quick try. I quit using Yahoo because they messed them up so bad. Now the charts could be good but the way I see it they have a big banner at the bottom of the page which causes the chart view to be too small. I am sticking with Tradingview.com for charts. Way better and all you do is type the Call letters and boom there is the chart. With Yahoo you have to go to the Quote area click on that then input the Call letters and WAIT - then here comes the chart but the view is awful in comparison.

After selecting the Comparisons and Indicators that you want to use in the full screen charts, you used to set cookies to save them between stock screens and between browser sessions. I have tries this in FireFox, Chrome, Internet Explorer, and Edge. FireFox is the only one that saves these selections. And that has limited value since you can't print the charts from FileFox. Really REALLY disappointed in your testing. I worked 20 years as a developer, and I would never NEVER release something without testing it on every browser I could think of. Some people are just too lazy I guess.

So many problems with 50/200 day moving averages (for example, how can a stock that has been around for many years not have a 200-day moving average that goes back more than 30 days?

Charts are too small (height), so you can't see minor changes in lines when looking at 1-yr charts or longer

I liked being able to see the 1-year change in price summarized on the chart, and that seems to be gone now.

Noticed a bunch of charts that seem to add in extra days at the same price to the right edge of the chart, which basically distorts everything with a horizontal line at the end (have seen as many as ~15-20 days added like this in some instances.

The vertical space for the chart is too small.
A lot of space is used for header, footer and advertisement.

If my browser window is not maximise (but still a big window, something like 1060x646), the space for the vertical axes is very very small, Great part of the vertical axes spaces is then used for the volume (the bottom part), and the top part is unused.)

The result is that the part of the windows used for really plot the graph is really really small (in vertical direction).

And the result of that is that almost always, what I can see even in a graph over 1 year time, is just an horizontal line!