Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  206 comments  ·  Fantasy Baseball » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Also, it doesn't "need" to be 162, leave it up to the league to decide the limit.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    The popularity of QS, and decline of Wins, is diminishing the value of middle relievers. My league wants to go to QS, which makes sense, as your pitcher is no longer dependent on his offense or bullpen for a category, but now the set-up guys are relegated to "Hope the closer in front of you gets hurt" rostering. Why would I waste innings on them when I know they can't get me a category and a spot starter can. I propose having a starts limit. And if you're already formulated for eligibility of QS, tracking starts should be easy. This way if your ERA/Whip start to stuff the best way to repair it without scarfing QS/W potential is through premier set-up/middle guys. They have become an essential part of real baseball, clubs are building their bullpens off the ninth and eight inning, some even 7 (Gregerson, Adams, Bell of yore), they should be an essential part of fantasy baseball. And "Holds" are still a flawed stat. This addition should not be too much additional work. I appreciate your time and consideration.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base