Review of comments needs to be consistent. Currently, it is not
I have a question about the following comment I posted. It was approved three times today and then it was rejected this evening, which makes no sense. Comment:
"Donnie and jeffrey were good friends for 15 years (“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Trump said. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life,” Trump continued. In 1997, Epstein and Trump were seen together at the Victoria Secret “Angels” party in New York. Trump also frequently flew on Epstein’s private jets – seven times in total between 1993 and 1997 – according to flight logs presented as evidence during Maxwell’s trial). "Enquiring" minds want to see the "birthday card" ('03- Donald: "A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”), and we want to know about "Trump hosting a party at Mar-a-Lago for young women in a so-called calendar girl competition, Mr. Epstein was the only other guest.” And, there's so much more. The pathological liar is flailing, trying to change the subject, but it is not working this time. Even his beyond ludicrous claim that former president Obama is "guilty" of treason, fell flat. Let's see what you're trying to hide, donnie. It couldn't be any worse than cheating on your wife with a **** star or claiming that you can grab women "wherever" because you think that you are "special". Or, could it. In 2024, while campaigning for the election, Trump said he would release information about the Epstein case. Oops . . ."
The comment was factual and I would like to know why your comment policy is inconsistent, when a comment is reviewed. Thank you,
