Trying to influence peoples political views before an election
Yahoo Twitter Facebook Google say they they do not influence elections. Humm exactly how honest is that? If their posted articles and censored material are not meant to suppress ideas then why do they share data with each other to ban certain posters or companies or private individuals? They state it is not censoring ideas but inaccurate and false information. Yet they post 90 percent anti conservative biased ideas out there on their websites. Where clearly if they were truly worried about influencing the out come of an election they would present both liberal and conservative ideas fairly evenly.
If libs were worried about external posters trying to influence our elections they should be as critical of the beast huffpost the independent and the other liberal rags that yahoo and other news media posts on their websites. Many of these sources come from Britain so they should be looking into possible collusion with these rags with the DNC. And looking at possible impeachment trials for everyone cooperating with them. It's no different than the impeachment of President Trump. But if articles learning one way or the other doesnt influence peoples opinions then why the impeachment?
These "NEWS" sources do share information about who goes where and posts this or that and I believe they also invade your email to read what you are sending and receiving. These companies have been raked over the coals in the last few weeks and they should be held accountable for their lies and the way the manipulate social media. Trying to influence elections. Just like those in Russia have been indicted for posting supposedly fake news about Hillary and other political liberals. The difference between them and these media groups those in Russia dont have anyone defending them and dont have the billions to argue their side. And these CEOs here in the states have powerful allies in congress and highly paid PR hitmen to attack accusers and ruin their lives. They hide behind a section of law that allows them to censor anything without fear of reprisal from those they try to discredit with libel or slander. They can lie without fear of rebuttal and censor those opposing voices that have to much influence if they feel those influencers can turn peoples opinions against them.
nunya biz
shared this idea