Review and loosen your censorship policies
What is wrong with THIS post??!!! Is it the link? Others in the same thread posted links!
The post: IF we were to do it (the 30% sales tax), we should do here what Canada apparently does with the Provinces and convert all the States into it too (incorporate them somehow) so that in States like Illinois and California and others with high taxation that the people in those States get relief from heavy State taxes. I don't care for this proposal based on this article, but it DOES sound a bit more palatable when one reads the Forbes article on the tax. Much better explanation. Here is the link from "99Magna's" post: https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2023/01/20/what-would-the-fair-tax-really-be-like-/?sh=380ef2c863f2
Matt F commented
Either be reasonable with comments that can be posted without excessive censoring or even better, provide good articles and no commenting at all. The click bait anger mongering model might make more money in the short term due to increased engagement, but it's a toxin to society and sure to cause long term failure of the brand. The only reason I am on yahoo is for use of a legacy email. I remember when that was yahoo's selling point. Now it's turned to a mental garbage mill, with the email as a side hussle.
Cali_ Eagle commented
It says on my other "idea" Yahoo CS (good abbreviation for Yahoo Customer Service) replied to my last complaint about an innocuous post. They DID NOT. Why are you people so extreme??? My last complaint was "reviewed" but NOT responded to. And now I have a harder time getting innocuous comments published. I am always willing to edit my comments when you censor them. In fact, I try to every time, and they used to get published RIGHT AWAY if I found some word(s) that I guessed you didn't like. Like "slaves" for instance, which is a ridiculous word to censor when discussing the woke and their desire for "reparations" from people that have never held them, to people that never were. I think you have me red flagged or something when I am always civil and don't insult anyone on the boards. I am critical and disparaging of policies proposed by Gavin Newsom, only because he knows NOTHING about economics OR he is trying to buy the votes of the gullible (something you wouldn't let me post either, but hey... it is what it is. California reparations aren't justified in 5 million different ways.) Be glad to explain them if you would like. You need to either loosen up the censorship or just go ahead and change the site name to "Pravda" and be done with it.