With respect to making comments on articles, I appreciate your inclusion of the appeal feature, because I use it and my comment often gets reinstated. That indicates to me that your censorship is overzealous and the program needs to be re-evaluated to allow more comments to post. For example, if I'm talking about **** Cheney, or the movie Queer, those words shouldn't cause my comment to be rejected. **** Cheney was our Vice President, and Hollywood made a movie called Queer. I should be able to talk about them without being censored. Additionally, on the off chance that my appeal is upheld, there is a "learn more" link that does not provide any reasoning for upholding the rejection. The moderator deciding to uphold the rejection should cite the specific reason why the comment is rejected so I know why and won't repeat it. Thank you in advance for your consideration.