Why was the word "***********" censored from my feedback comment when the article itself was about *********** and contained the word *********** throughout the article AND in the headline?
I posted a comment on the story that was just released on the 18th about the senator who was arrested for child **** on his phone
That comment received over 2,000 thumbs up and 300 thumbs down with over 400 replies
although the article still remains, that entire post and thread was deleted just hours after it started.
It appears that since it was critical of the Republican party, and listed many CONVICTED Republican office holders Yahoo once again chose to delete that thread in order to manipulate the comments to their liking
Thank you Yahoo for demonstrating your bias and manipulation.
I am now wondering if this is just a preview of the manipulation and censorship we can expect from Yahoo during the upcoming campaigns and elections
Sadly Yahoo's ethics have deteriorated to that of a puppet show for special interests and politicians
Please explain what part of the following post prevents it from being shared with the community other than for the reason it goes against the biased opinion of YAHOO... "Companies like Papa Johns are just following the SAME business plan perfected by Walmart of playing the game of NOT PAYING their EMPLOYEES... making EVERY TAXPAYER subsidize their business' by those employees collecting WELFARE while they themselves pocket the 'Gravy Train'.... Just goes to show you how strung-along the gullible actually are and how THEY THEMSELVES are supporting the WELFARE STATE that they all whine about..... TELL PAPA JOHNS... WALMART.... and all the other mooching millionaire rackets to GET OFF WELFARE"...... that post does NOT violate ANY of YAHOO's rules and it's censorship proves that YAHOO practices manipulation of content based on it's own opinions
14th rankedGathering feedback · 220 comments · Yahoo Homepage » Bug or Error · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Please explain why Yahoo once again rejects and blocks comments that do not violate any rules but seems to be censored based on the personal opinions of Yahoo moderators who are intent on manipulating the comment section based on what appears to be Yahoo's hidden agenda.... Please explain WHY the following comment is being rejected...
~ "The contents of the Mueller report should be released in it's entirety to the citizens of the US soon after they are submitted to the court as evidence, and all the defendants are named.
the only specifics that need to be redacted are details of how evidence was obtained if releasing details of those methods compromises the ability to conduct future investigations" ~
This is a perfect example as to why the public sees Yahoo as being biased and manipulative when Yahoo rejects straight forward comments that do not contain vulgarities but only offers legitimate opinions while at the same time Yahoo promotes and allows the posting of comments that clearly are the posts of trolls who use threats of violence... vulgarities... and even pornographic images contained in gif's to incite and fester hate... Yahoo is becoming ground zero and a home base for distributing racist remarks and further fueling hatred
"The Grand Jury has now been held over for a reason... once we get to be entertained by his perp-walk we can focus on reopening the government... finish rounding up the rest of his cohorts and then go back to watching him babble and cry in court on multiple counts..... SEE there is ALWAYS a silver lining" ... it seems yahoo continues to manipulate comments to fit their needs and disregard the fact that my post does not violate any rules other than the personal opinions of their censors
~ Between an "expert" that says if you keep the safety engaged on a crossbow "it won't go off"... and a 'journalist' that says "and a piece of the bow called “the bolt” struck him in the back of the head".... a 'bolt' is the projectile... or 'arrow' to most people.... it's hard to believe these people have jobs ~ ... other than being critical of the ineptness of the 'journalist' I see no reason for censoring other than your 'hurt feelings'