Skip to content

None

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 10th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    None commented  · 

    For any private leagues of dynasty or keepers I agree. For public leagues no, To many guys sign up and never hear from them again.

  2. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    None commented  · 

    With all the other things yahoo has screwed the pooch on this is a concern and this is under review ? Geez yahoo hire someone that knows what they are doing and how about review that new ceo ,ever since she came in yahoo fantasy sports has gone down hill.

  3. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    None commented  · 

    Mavrock....reading your post on the RBs I cant agree more with your "Here's a breakdown of the issue in that same league" post. It is freaking ridicules for one team to horde RBs or any other position so others cant use them. Now if they picked them up as trade bait I have no problem with that BUT if they do it so others cant pick them up then that's bs. Just my opinion. In my own league for 10 years I had to cut the bench size down from 6 to 5 to now 4 because of idiots. ( QB, RB,RB WR WR , WR, TE , (RB/WR< (used only for return guys only) D , K, and any 3 IDPs) Now guys have to actually use strategy for the bye weeks and cant horde positions, The biggest down fall is lack of bench players due to idiots hording and not trading. With a cap on position this will eliminate hording positions and can add more bench. I as much as the next guy like to have extra RBs or WRs but not to ***** other teams.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    None commented  · 

    I been telling yahoo this for years. It its really fucstrating when a team has 6 rbs on there roster and wont trade them and openly tells everyone that he picked them up so nobody else does. Even after reducing the bench to try to eliminate this in the private league some idiot still does it. ESPN has a limited position and it works well with the idiots. Unfortunately ESPN fantasy football has other deficiency's that keep me from taking my league there for now. Cap on position is a excellent idea. For private leagues let the commish decide on how many per position. If you do this try not to ***** the pooch on this idea like you have in the past...please.

Feedback and Knowledge Base