Shawn Chellis
My feedback
-
42nd rankedShawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
95th rankedGathering feedback · 1 comment · Fantasy Baseball » Draft Issues · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Shawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
-
134th rankedGathering feedback · 4 comments · Fantasy Baseball » Cheating or Sportmanship · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn Chellis
commented
This is absolutely necessary for a h2h points league. It would solve a lot of issues with teams loading up with starting pitchers as mentioned. I tried to curb it myself by adding a 2nd UTL slot to my league because often people complain that they know when a SP is going to start but they don't always know when a bat is going to play.
The only issue I have with a split bench is right now it is fairly easy to find a decent hitter on the FA when you lose a bat, if you add a couple of offensive bench slots it will become impossible, though you will likely have more starting pitching available...in my league even the guys with 5.00 ERAs are grabbed.
Have altered points so that bad starts are punished, have tried changing starting slots for offense, while both have been effective I think splitting the bench would really drive it home. My other thought was just reducing roster size from 26 to 24 since I don't have this issue really in my other league a 18 team 26 man roster (primary is a 20/26) so that is close to 52 extra players in the FA list, so dropping two slots per team would at least get it in the ball park at 40.
Shawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
-
122nd rankedGathering feedback · 2 comments · Fantasy Baseball » Disabled List · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Shawn Chellis
shared this idea
·
-
19th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn Chellis
commented
While I would welcome this idea for mistakes that were from the I know I made this change (likely forgot to hit accept button), I know it would become a massive issue when teams pick the wrong guy to start or have a pitcher get blown up. Oh I meant to bench that guy I know I did.
I lost a championship last year because I left three guys on the bench that I thought I started. So while I can see the value, it would bring a lot of problems to leagues as well.
-
10th rankedGathering feedback · 47 comments · Fantasy Baseball » Playoffs · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn Chellis
commented
IF this is brought into play I would like a notation put on anyone that is in a league of this nature. Personally I find anyone that wants to jump ship to a lesser sport in the middle of the season not worthy of being in a baseball league and would rather avoid bringing them in because they would likely quit on me.
-
63rd ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn Chellis
commented
greenraven1, in my leagues I just created a PTBNL rule. Basically these guys stay on the rosters they are currently on till they are promoted or come off the DL then the trade has to be completed. Makes no sense to force a team(s) to cut player just to complete a trade.
-
39th ranked
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn Chellis
commented
Maximum innings for head to head to help curb streaming, both from cycling out of the FA list and rostering 10-12 starting pitchers
Shawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
-
5th rankedGathering feedback · 44 comments · Fantasy Baseball » Scoring · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Shawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
-
17th rankedShawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
-
3rd rankedShawn Chellis
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Shawn Chellis
commented
In my leagues I always have the three way as part of one deal and just post the full trade on the message board. When the one trade clears I make the other roster moves necessary with the commissioner tools. However it would be nice if there was a feature to pull in other teams into deals. I don't see why I would stop at just three teams. I've done a four team deal, and at times it was up to a five or six teamer.
Need way more DL slots available. Find it a joke that there are a max 10 NA slots while DL hasn't been increased in anyway when it is generally something that teams can't control. NAs they can add at will and deal with some prospect that is two years or more away, DL trips can happen any time and more frequently with the 10 day DL and people have no real option this year other then dropping quality players. This isn't really a option in a deep keeper league. Personally I think there should be a unlimited DL list.