Anonymous
My feedback
3 results found
-
11th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1st ranked
-
5th rankedAnonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
I just posted a comment like this because I couldn't find anyone else talking about it, now that I have, here's what I can add. I wanted to look at weekly matchup records against the "if they played every other team each week, their record would be...". It was surprising to put them up next to each other.
Matt Lee was 12-2, his other record was 57-41. (Meaning he outscored 57 managers over the season and was outscored by 31 overall)
Stephen was 9-5 and his other record was 60-38.
Andrew was 7-7 and his record was 55-43
Drew was 7-7 and his record was 51-47
(here's where it gets crazy)
I was 7-7 (somehow) and my record was 38-60 (that's right)
Alex was 6-8 and his record was 60-38 (same as stephen)
Mike was 4-10 and his overall record was 40-58 (better than me)
Ted was 4-10 and was 29-69.
Going even further, if Yahoo decided to score with those records instead of a head-to-head matchup each week, the playoffs would be : 1. Stephen, 2. Alex, 3. Matt Lee and 4. Andrew.
Just food for though when looking at how lucky/unlucky some were, simply because of when they registered for the league (thats what decides the schedule).