J B

My feedback

  1. 24th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  57 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Rosters/Lineups  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J B supported this idea  · 
  2. 5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J B supported this idea  · 
  3. 19th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  91 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Injury Designations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J B commented  · 

    We have had situations where a manager keeps an active player in an IR spot and then does a 2 for 1 trade so that they don't have to ever drop a player in order to make room for the no-longer-IR player. It basically gives them an extra roster spot to leverage which isn't right. They should have to deal with the discrepancy of an active player in an IR spot before being able to make any type of transaction.

    Not being able to make waiver moves while having an active player in an IR spot isn't enough because you don't always need to make waiver moves.

    J B supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J B commented  · 

    It has been mentioned that it is not "illegal" to leave an active player in an IR spot because they can't make transactions, but this essentially gives a manager an extra roster spot, especially in smaller leagues with deep benches where you can go a while without transactions.

    Our league would prefer you can't even move starters if you have an active player in an IR spot. Essentially you should have to deal with that discrepancy before you can do anything else, but there is no way to configure this. The only option is to manually track it and enforce an arbitrary rules/penalty (FAAB budget deduction?). It'd be much nicer if this was handled by default (or configurable).

Feedback and Knowledge Base