Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Yahoo claims to an objective source of news but over the past few months, it appears you just enjoy writing/posting bandwagon hot topic articles with little to no research and a clear stance of bias. I should have sounded off on this months ago but as of today I have tipped over the edge. It does not surprise me that your website/publication has jumped on the bandwagon of other media publications in the very shameful posthumous lynching of Michael Jackson with the "Leaving Neverland "documentary". You should be ashamed of yourselves, claiming to be a credible source of news and heavily promoting a film with little to no research, an overuse of manipulative techniques to appeal to the emotions of the audience and ultimately distort a narrative and very, very obvious bias and ***** and accusers with very questionable credibility. In the past few months you have collected biased articles from other outlets or written them yourselves, all of which failed to do any research, speak with any members on the opposing side and I can't help but noticed that EVERY article failed to mention anything about Jackson's 2005 exoneration, FBI investigations with no evidence found, and corrections of false reports. Not a SINGLE article was published when evidence came out against Safechuck's train station claim.

    And now you have committed this biggest, most biased, cruel and disrespectful act of all by publishing a recycled article that is largely a film review of "Leaving Neverland" from four months ago by Kevin Polowy on the 10 anniversary of his death as a poor excuse of a tribute/retrospective, especially with the headline "I don't see how anyone can listen to this man's music anymore". How disgraceful and trifling can you be?

    You have allowed your bias and opinion to stand in the place of facts. You think Jackson was weird? Fine. But weird does not a criminal make. Where is your energy for Harvey Weinstine, a many with multiple accusers and credible evidence to support their claims?

    As a journalism student, I am especially and incredibly outraged by your blatant infractions of media bias. Your refusal to fact check and report evidence rather than opinion and bias makes your publication look like a huge joke to journalist devoted to uncovering the truth and reporting facts. Is it not the job of a journalist to remain objective and report facts? Is it not a journalist's job to research and check every fact for validity. Is it not the job of a journalist to be the voice of the falsely accused, the wrong, the vulnerable, the weak and those unable to defend themselves? Why cherry pick who you will serve justice to? Why pick and chose when you want to be a noble muckraker? Why let the court of public opinion outweigh the court of law and the verdict of innocence?

    Until you can take an initiative to report facts, remove your bias and correct one of the greatest Journalist injustices and embarrassments in this country I won't be looking to you for my news.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base