Skip to content

Edward Reed

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 1st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Edward Reed commented  · 

    I have been asking for this for years now, and it's all over the message board. It's outrageous it hasn't been added. There is a raging debate between QS or W; having a category that awarded 1 point for a QS or a Win (no double counting) would allow for the best of both worlds.

    Another option would be to have a category that is "Wins by a Starter", so you can use Wins but don't have to deal with "fake" reliever wins.

    It's inconceivable that Yahoo! can't figure this out over half a decade

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Edward Reed commented  · 

    Please implement this! It would be a huge improvement. Otherwise I may have to move my league to an alternative site. Please also make it so there is an option for no double counting (i.e., if a pitcher gets a W and a QS in one start, they only get one point).

    It has been five years and this is still at the top of the hot topics...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Edward Reed commented  · 

    Strongly support this idea, with the caveat that there should be only one point possible per outing (i.e., a P cannot get a QS and a W in the same game). Would be a HUGE improvement -- both W and QS have limitations that this new stat would address!

    Edward Reed supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base