Could Yahoo be any more blatantly biased with the headlines and summaries it uses in the news feed? For the AP story about the certificatio
Do you think Yahoo could be any more blatantly biased with the headlines and summaries it uses in the news feed? For the AP story about the certification of the Alabama senate race results it was stated "Alabama's secretary of state certifies Democrat Doug Jones won the Senate race after a judge denies the legal challenge by accused child ******** Roy Moore." Don't you think it would have been a more objective description to use the words "...by Republican opponent Roy Moore"? The angle on the story presented by the summary statement seems intent on sensationalizing the accusations against Roy Moore rather than the simple fact of what is being reported on. Apparently, the news feed writer still has some sort of axe to grind on the big story around that election. I will at least give him or her credit for including the adjective "accused".