Why is yahoo continuing to reject ALL of my comments? All of them! What gives?
John Foust
shared this idea
-
Donald Grant
commented
Working class people Yahoo don't like you complaining about you lot in life one here. They don't care that you are suffering just like the government. So vote the liberals out of office and keep voting the replacement out until they get tired of being out of office after one term. We are the biggest group of American and we can put anyone into power. But now I have been banned by Yahoo so boycott them.
-
Donald Grant
commented
As with the liberals below I would like to cancel news people that I can't comment on. I maybe a conservative but I should have the same rights. Youtube has that feature, so you can too. And just like the liberal below I would like to make sure CNN doesn't make money off of me. As they would like Fox News not to make money off of them.
-
Tom Benjes
commented
why can't i remove yahoo news from my computer.
-
Tom Benjes
commented
how can i remove the yahoo news
-
Tom Benjes
commented
allow all people access to the comment's or just stop for everyone so we can remove yahoo news altogether.
-
Rick Schneble
commented
I'm done with Yahoo. I'm conservative and a Trump supporter and have been called every name under the sky from lib posters. Yet I leave comments that are just my point and they delete them. They can have it. I'm back to Newsmax where both left and right posters can post without constantly being harassed by far left dem moderators. Change the name to Yahoo Democrat Party forum.
-
Fernando A.
commented
Ive had many comments rejected and were not at all vulgar slanderous or threatening and contained no profanity but did go against the topic of the article or opposed the view of the author that wrote the article and objective criticism is the purpose of having a comments section to allow those of opposing points of view to state their comment on the article.
-
Fernando A.
commented
In the comments section of the news feed posts you only allow comments that are for the topic or that are for special interests of yahoo and not allow the opposing perspective view comments. I understand not allowing comments that are crude threatening or derogatory but most of us adults are capable of making a comment that is opposing but not profane or threatening. If only 1 view is allowed to comment then it should not be called News but should be called News filtered by yahoo.
-
M M
commented
You can tell Yahoo is moderated by women.
-
Dennis Hansen
commented
How can yahoo community standards reject my simple comment "MAGA = Making America Grossly Amoral" if you're tuned in at all to watching and listening to Trump (an avowed pathological liar) use much worse inflammatory speech. He's now even channel Adolph Hitilter and Benito Mussolini's use of the word "vermin" regarding those he'll destroy if elected.
-
nunya biz
commented
Why do you have gifs available for use if they are going to get the post removed by your censors? Remove them from being available if you people don't like them.
-
sharon miller
commented
this is the second time my post was put on hold (and I really am not sure why) I can guess because I called the other poster a crybaby, yet in both cases so nasty things were said about me but they were allowed!
So unless you are going to censure all of it dont just do some of it.
when I am called a **** and you allow it to be posted how are you protecting anyone?? -
John Doe
commented
Welcome to Yahoo comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To foster productive and respectful conversations, We would agree to this if you did not selectively block comments from designated parts of the country.
-
PHILIP WHITFIELD
commented
This comment was posted in response to the article, “Pro-Gaza ceasefire activists shut down Manhattan Bridge for hours” on 11/29/2023
According to liberals:
A black man supports Trump - slamming him is fine.
A black man is anti-Trump - slamming him is racist.
It was rejected. Please explain just why it was ‘censored’?
-
Mary Fehrenbach
commented
As per our illustrious replublican party what has happened to 'freedom of speech'?
-
Mary Fehrenbach
commented
I don't understand your guidelines for feedbacks. If I don't use nasty language I can still have a comment rejected because for some reason it seems to hurt 'someones' sensitivities! Holy Jesu..just how much do we need to cater to everyone's snowflakeness? Life is harsh, buck up. These young folks need to enter reality! Like the young women who graduated COLLEGE and cried because she couldn't believe she had to work 9-5!!!!! It's like ??????. I even expect this comment to be rejected! Trump has no problem hurting anyone's feeling and Fox praises it but If I try to tiptoe through my responses to an article I'm rejected????!!!! I need some clarification as to why. AND, I would like this explanation sent directly to my YAHOO EMAIL ACCT.
-
george your words are useless
commented
i never said trumps words were the cause of Gabby's shooting. reading comprehension ? and you have no clue what tyranny looks like.
please explain, what needs moderating there ?
i bet it will be approved in two weeks like most of the posts your flawed moderation flags. i was wrong it was rejected. how pathetic. i am done with you yahoo -
Linwood Lyons
commented
It is critical because someone keeps reporting my posts, and eventually I'll be banned. That has happened before on Yahoo. I was banned for posting comments saying that global warming was a problem. One more more deniers reported several posts. I suspect that reviewers are given 5-10 seconds to respond to a report, and if the post is long, they don't have time to read it, and just approve the report and reject the comment. That's probably still true.
-
Linwood Lyons
commented
Keep track of post complaints, including who makes them. specifically who makes them. When 1 individual reports several posts, that are mostly okay, then that person should be disqualified from reporting. Maybe without even telling the person. For example I posted a comment to this article which was rejected:
https://news.yahoo.com/transcript-rep-ken-buck-face-181932644.html
"Yep. Remember southern 'conservatives' were democrats from the time of the civil war until Johnson passed the civil rights act and the voting rights act. They were called dixiecrats. Johnson said at the time, "We've lots the southern vote for a generation." Wrong. A century. (This comment is not only appropriate, but historically correct!)" -
Kaye Munroe
commented
Not every post is an insult against people!
I was posting about how animals in shelters have been rejected by former owners, but couldn't because Yahoo's AI apparently thought I was calling humans "rejects." Just now, I couldn't post that a food was "yucky."
AI has progressed now, so there's no excuse for this kind of archaic censorship. Yahoo needs to keep their tech up to date.