Why is yahoo continuing to reject ALL of my comments? All of them! What gives?
John Foust
shared this idea
-
[Deleted User]
commented
YOU ARE DISCRIMINATING AGAINST ME IN YOUR COMMENTS SECTION. I AM GOING TO FILE A LAWSUIT THEN INVITE ALL OTHERS YOU HAVE DONE THIS WAY TO MAKE IT A CLASS ACTION. BEND OVER AND GRAB YOUR ANKLES *************.
-
Robert Tevens
commented
First Amendment
-
Robert Tevens
commented
Dear Mr. Daniel Klaidman, EIC: This morning, your editorial team erroneously restricted the following comment from me concerning Trumps "Dry Finger" story. I commented, that as a Former Latent Fingerprint Examiner with the FBI/HQ, Washington D.C. a person with dry fingers exhibits truthfulness not deception. Why was I prohibited from saying this? Bob
-
Donald Jones
commented
Democrats lie 24/7. Ban these trolls
-
Donald Jones
commented
Yahoo is run by pedophiles
-
Douglas Cox
commented
You obviously are not an American company because the freedom of speech or ideas seem to only apply to liberal woke democrates, because if you side with or give a favorable response to any republican story the only people that can make hurtful or derogatory comments in their replies are obvious woke liberal dems. I hope Musk buys Yahoo and fires all of you!
-
Douglas Cox
commented
You seem to have no problem censoring my comments in general and I know that it is because I am a Republican, because all of the Dem/woke/liberal replies I get that are sarcastic, bullying or just plan out of line you let through without a thought, but I reply to a news story or give a replier a mean come back and you censor it, but not there's. Does the word hypocrite mean anything to you? Probably not.
-
Rachel Christenson
commented
My only comment is to affirm how important I think Yahoo has become to the way our society works, from the highest to the humblest levels. In that sense it is one vitally important way that the most damaging potentials of the wealth dichotomy are being, at least partially, countervailed. It would be difficult to overstate the importance of the service Yahoo provides.
-
Rachel Christenson
commented
Please read this. It's the comment I posted after doing considerable research:
“The evidence given is anecdotal. Some who like big issues kept plain may take comfort in it, but I would not want our government to do so.
We have spent billions putting extremely expensive equipment in space around our planet with the specific intent of getting more accurate data about what the troposphere and the oceans are up to. We have also spent billions on super-sophisticated computer modeling to chew on the data that space-based systems provide.
The ocean surface is turbulent, so there isn't such a thing as absolute sea level. What scientists use to keep an eye on what is happening is a reference base called Global Mean Surface Level, which is the aggregated product of huge amounts of ongoing altimetric data collection done by special satellites. Computers make subtle corrections for the water vapor condition of the atmospheric traverse of the light pulses used and compile the results into a model which is then compared to a reference base called the Geoid (basically where everything would be if absolute dead calm persisted everywhere).
By this means, over time, a bigger picture emerges.
In general, the science has held up pretty **** well, but ideological interference from political, religious, business and change-phobic interests has made it difficult for our government to act on the product of the investments it has made in this area of information technology.
This could prove to be very unfortunate for many.”
All of it is absolutely true. Yet your moderator algorithm claimed people could be offended by it. Does this mean you are censoring facts that some people find inconvenient? I have run into this several times before, despite being careful with my use of speech.
Inadvertently, you could be sacrificing valuable contribution with the use of this algorithm - the same algorithm that allowed another commenter to refer to Democratic Party legislators as “idiots”. If you, reading this, are a human being, know that we genuinely appreciate your efforts. I just think the algorithm needs to be better, otherwise people we could benefit hearing from are going to stop participating.
-
Archer Longbottomleaf
commented
You ban everyone that points out facts vs the disgusting gop trolls but let those scumbags comment anyway they like, who owns yahoo,fox news
-
Cali_ Eagle
commented
You should abolish comments if the only side you are going to permit to comment is the one that reads the Daily Worker or Pravda. What is WRONG with you people? Are you not Americans? Do you not believe in the 1st Amendment? Why do love the "woke" so much that you suppress any opposing comment? NOT ONE OF MY COMMENTS was unacceptable to anyone engaging in free thinking. Look at ALL of them (I know you have all 5 attempts on record). Wait till YOU aren't permitted to post stories or information or ANYTHING that you want to, but have to submit it for approval first, or are ordered not to. The you will see the Genie you helped get out of the bottle. But then it will be too late for you.
-
Cali_ Eagle
commented
"So sayeth the fascist who wants to institute a one-party (fascist of course) rule on the US." - Ann K's post maligning me & on the recent Ohio Education Thread (4/6/23). I wasn't allowed to reply after 4 or 5 edits & even starting fresh w. an even more most innocuous comment. Anyone of my comment attempts would've been acceptable on "Mr. Rogers". I couldn't even report it as a personal attack! Why defend (& of course, protect & hand- hold them. Coddle them & their sensitivities) the "woke" & suppress the rational?
-
Donald Grant
commented
Again You are censoring me because I talk to the working class about how this government and the elites in this country screws them? That makes you NAZI's. And your new sub class of humans the working class.
-
Donald Grant
commented
You are censoring me because I talk to the working class as to how you miserable elites are screwing the working class? So you have become Gerbals propaganda machine. Making you and your people no more then NAZI's.
-
Sebas B
commented
Report and denounce this company and its websites for unAmerican activities and policies to the federal goverment...
-
Sebas B
commented
You communist **** tater loving lowlifes belong at the bottom of a river
-
Patrick Craig
commented
Allow free speech! You seem to be just as bad as Google!
-
[Deleted User]
commented
The fact that yahoo can post articles that tear communities apart but not a single ‘journalist’, if you even want to call them that seeing as most of them have their liberal arts degrees, can cover the 9 soldiers who died in a helicopter crash. Pay your respect, yahoo, to those who allow you to abuse your censorship privileges along with your first amendment rights
-
Larry Smith
commented
Stop using the ambiguous "Violates community standards" to violate our 1st amendment rights provided that vulgarity or threats are not involved!
-
Tom Goyne
commented
It is a comment section. Normal comments should be allowed.