why do you run all these local stories without even identifying where they're from? I just read something that looks like it's from Britain,
but no one can tell because there's no dateline. This story reports that a couple tortured several children. It goes on for many paragraphs, detailing the torture, of course, but without any description of who these children were, and how this couple were able to abuse them for many years. IT APPEARS that these were foster children, but the article doesn't say a word about it. ARE YOU JUST RUNNING THESE STORIES IN ORDER TO PRINT DESCRIPTIONS OF ABUSE? Because you have not printed any information about who, or what, or when, or where. One has to conclude you're not really interested in conveying information, and you just want to attract readers who like to read about abuse of children.
1040th
ranked
Senya Means
shared this idea