Real science and falsification
I can phrase this in the form of a question. If the planet's surface temperature is about 60-F, then that means there are already many regions and nations with average temperatures above 60-F now. Those regions are proof that a higher temperature already exists on the planet in many regions. Say, Australia, which is a continent. Its average temperature is 70-F now. They are all good. Many regions have average temperatures above 80-F now. Also, they are all good. These inconvenient truths would falsify global warming hysteria. Humans already exist and survive in locations with higher temps than the doomsday predictions from the UN/IPCC, which is a political organization, not a scientific organization. When Greta addressed the UN, please note that she was a 16 yo teenager with absolutely zero knowledge of science. If the UN was really trying to convince humanity that GCC/GW was real and scientifically valid, why would they bring a 16 yo girl to mane that point? Maybe an actual scientist would be a better witness. Having a crying teenager at the UN is a political maneuver. She is not a scientific authority on anything. Neither is the UN, not a scientific organization.
David worner
shared this idea
