Stop telling us you're not censoring us while actively censoring us with an out of control LLM
Stop telling us you're not censoring us while actively censoring us with an out of control LLM. I know hardly anyone actually works at this shell of a company so can you maybe turn off the robots
Justin Boles
shared this idea
-
ROBERT STEWART
commented
You allow words and phrases to appear in articles yet you will censor comments using those same words. You will not allow Nazi to appear in a post. But when you do that, you miss the content's intent. The word is not bad, it's how it's used. So, fix your algorithms to know the difference or stop blocking words you don't like.
-
Wayne B Dowdle
commented
Stop the censorship....Trump is not a fascists but Kamala says so...Kamala would not have done nothing different ....does that include censorship.....se believes in my body my choice....but they fired and destroyed lives over vaccines ....and she say she would do nothing different....I am being censored!!! Stop it....I have not broke the guiides and everything I say is provable truth unlike this candidate for president!!!
-
glenn mayeshiro
commented
Stop censoring comments
-
Dave Adams
commented
I posted an inert comment about a football game, and my comment was rejected, as was my appeal. It contained the word "bull" but no cursing. It was critical of referees and the NFL, but there were no disparaging remarks made about them or any individual referred or individual person. This is the comment: "At that point in the game, at that spot on the field, the most important player on the field (as far as calling penalties) was only being watched by one ref? Seriously? If Darnold had committed a penalty, I'm sure more than one flag would've come out. Shameful... and a load of bull."
I don't understand the algorithm or the reviewers standards as this is not the first time I've tried to post an inert comment and it was rejected and so was the appeal. And, something else I've noted is that any criticism of the Yahoo news feed partners brings a rejection (comments about stories being inaccurate or filled with errors). If we're not allowed to comment critically while consciously avoiding any language that could be a violation of decorum, then what's the point of allowing comments at all?
The standards need to be reviewed and fixed to allow for context and for an algorithm or human misinterpretation. The word "bull" is not a violation of the terms.