Rosters - Allow dual position roster spots
Requests to allow dual position roster spots such as SG/SF, G/F, or PF/C.

-
Shawn Erickson commented
I'd like to see them get rid of some of the roster spots and adopt something more like the NBA reality.
1 position each for: PG, SG, SF, PF, C, G/F, PF/C, Util, and 6X Bench & 3X IL. then allow players listed as "out" to be placed on the IL along with the other IL eligble players. Reduce the number of starters on fantasy rosters. It makes the teams feel more like an actual NBA game rotation and then a bench mob. If Yahoo made the Start/Sit decision require more thought, it would be far more fun to play. -
Andrew commented
I'm glad to see this suggestion posted! ESPN has these flex roster spots, seems like it would be easy to add, and we would definitely use them right away. We all hate the utility position, but the other flex options are inadequate.
-
Sim commented
Please add the new flex position roster spots now during the offseason before it's too late! Every year you say it's a good idea and then you never do it. We moved our league to ESPN for the last two seasons, but we'll move it back if you add this feature.
-
Sim commented
Please allow custom leagues to use SG/SF and PF/C flex positions as roster requirements if they want to.
-
Sim commented
Any update on adding PF/C and SG/SF flex positions as roster options in custom leagues? Our league still desperately wants this feature that is offered on almost every other fantasy basketball platform. Now that message boards are gone, there seems to be fewer and fewer reasons to stick with Yahoo for fantasy basketball. Please at least give us PF/C and SG/SF flex positions as a consolation prize.
-
Sim commented
Please allow custom leagues to use SG/SF and PF/C flex positions as roster requirements if they want to.
-
Zhu Heng commented
jalen smith add C postion
-
AdminProduct Support (Admin, Yahoo) commented
Create new roster positions including:
-PF/C
-SG/SF -
voltaire v commented
I was just wondering if a F/C position can be added that is not a UTIL position?