try not to be so obviously biased to the left
try reporting new fairly. move to the middle, not FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR LEFT.
L E
shared this idea
-
Roger Gauthier
commented
Provide positives for each side so there is a conversation. It cannot be all one way. Remember the are people who wear masks outside. There are also people who just don't care. If someone shot a elephant who cares who they are. If you do show all people who have shot elephants. Give truth to both sides and yahoo will blow up and be more successful than the rest. Most yahoo headlines sound like 15 yr. old adultescents wrote them after watching TMZ.
-
Irene
commented
Dylan Stableford is no legal expert so, when Chauvin's trial verdict is guaranteed to cause riots, why do you have an article where he describes 2nd degree murder as requiring proof that "Chauvin caused Floyd's death while assaulting him"? That's the end of his definition! Then Stableford ends his article with "None of the charges requires prosecutors to prove Chauvin intended to kill Floyd".
Well, here's Justia's definition of 2nd degree murder: "Second-degree murder is defined as an INTENTIONAL killing that was not premeditated".
It's MURDER. It might not require premeditation, but it most definitely requires INTENT! Only manslaughter is unintentional. Murder also requires proof of MALICE. Chauvin is required to have intended to act in a manner so reckless that he knows it will likely kill somebody, and knows that it is outside the scope of his job duties. He can't have been acting within the scope of his duties and be charged with MURDER! Cops kill criminals all the time (and vice versa)! That's like charging soldiers with murder for killing on the battlefield. Please don't have Dylan play big boy legal analyst anymore, while people's lives and businesses are at stake. He never does sufficient research for stuff like that. I wish somebody would hold Yahoo liable for all of the crime and murder your sloppy misreporting causes. And, of course, no comment section so people might correct Dylan's faulty legal definitions.
-
Don
commented
I block the lying con artists from the fake news site Fox News EVERYDAY..... but their blatant BS articles full of anti-American horses**t keep showing up EVERYDAY. Which tells me that you don't actually block anything, do you? What would it take for you to actually do what you say you'll do?
-
Irene
commented
Today, there was an article titled "Am I a Fetish or the Prettiest Girl In The Room? Why Attractive Black Women trigger White People" The article claimed that the painting "A Pair of Broad Bottoms" had been made to objectify black women, resulting in the expectation that black women have large bottoms and twerk. When I pointed out that the two people in the painting were actual people at the time (Sarah Baartman and Lord Grenville), who looked the way the painting had depicted, the moderator kept removing my comment. Apparently, he can't be bothered to do a google search before determining if my comment is factual enough to be posted.
The same is true for a later comment I tried to give explaining that only a small fraction of white Americans descend from ***** owners. This is a fact that has been attested to by several experts, including Nell Irvine Painter, an African American black studies professor and historian at Princeton University, in her book "The History of White People". Even snopes tries to exaggerate the percentage by pointing out that Adam Rothman, a historian at Georgetown University, claims 7.4% of white Americans owned slaves. Well, that's still a small fraction. Snopes takes issue because this number includes non-*****-holding states, but my comment never claimed to be only about *****-holding states and, further, ***** ownership came nowhere close to the majority of white households even in the South. Some states were worse than others, but I didn't specify I was discussing any specific state. Rather, I clarified I'm discussing white Americans today, the majority of whom, as I said, "do not descend from *****-owners". As widely known as this fact is, when I tried to post it, the Yahoo moderator blocked me from making any more comments and threatened to remove my yahoo account. Am I supposed to lie and claim the bulk of white Americans DO descend from ***** owners? Because your "terms and conditions" claim we're not supposed to lie in the comments section. If we are only allowed to post "facts", how come both your articles and the comments section are filled with leftist inaccuracies that we will have our Yahoo accounts removed for trying to correct?
-
Irene
commented
Today, there was an article titled "Am I a Fetish or the Prettiest Girl In The Room? Why Attractive Black Women trigger White People" The article claimed that the painting "A Pair of Broad Bottoms" had been made to objectify black women, resulting in the expectation that black women have large bottoms and twerk. When I pointed out that the two people in the painting were actual people at the time (Sarah Baartman and Lord Grenville), who looked the way the painting had depicted, the moderator kept removing my comment. Apparently, he can't be bothered to do a google search before determining if my comment is factual enough to be posted.
The same is true for a later comment I tried to give explaining that only a small fraction of white Americans descend from ***** owners. This is a fact that has been attested to by several experts, including Nell Irvine Painter, an African American black studies professor and historian at Princeton University, in her book "The History of White People". Even snopes tries to exaggerate the percentage by pointing out that Adam Rothman, a historian at Georgetown University, claims 7.4% of white Americans owned slaves. Well, that's still a small fraction. Snopes takes issue because this number includes non-*****-holding states, but my comment never claimed to be only about *****-holding states and, further, ***** ownership came nowhere close to the majority of white households even in the South. Some states were worse than others, but I didn't specify I was discussing any specific state. Rather, I clarified I'm discussing white Americans today, the majority of whom, as I said, "do not descend from *****-owners". As widely known as this fact is, when I tried to post it, the Yahoo moderator blocked me from making any more comments and threatened to remove my yahoo account. Am I supposed to lie and claim the bulk of white Americans DO descend from ***** owners? Because your "terms and conditions" claim we're not supposed to lie in the comments section. If we are only allowed to post "facts", how come both your articles and the comments section are filled with leftist inaccuracies that we will have our Yahoo accounts removed for trying to correct?
-
Irene
commented
Ever since the Capitol riot, Yahoo has brought us photos and videos focused on each individual involved, claimed we need to remove free speech from the internet, and encouraged family members to turn eachother in: none of which Yahoo did during the much deadlier BLM riots over the summer. Yahoo gives us all of the info: name, occupation, history, etc. of each and every person there, but they didn't think we needed any such coverage regarding looters and arsonists in BLM. Today, they brought us this ridiculous video analyzing the "hate symbols" worn in the Capitol riots: "This guy made an 'OK' hand signal, this guy appears to be wearing a Bugs Bunny tattoo, lots of people wearing yellow", sort of thing. "We're not sure if the protestors understand the significance of their hand signals, tattoos, or colors" yada yada. Yahoo's bias has always been rather maddening when they aren't busy being laughable.
-
Irene
commented
I know you posted this 4 years ago, and all they've done since is remove the comments section so they can misquote Trump and we can't call them out anymore. Today, Ben Werschkul, who is apparently Yahoo's Senior Producer and Writer at Yahoo Finance, claimed Trump had called Mexican immigrants "rapists". In reality, what Trump said was "I speak with border guards, and they tell me what we are getting. Some are criminals, some are rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but we aren't getting Mexico's best and brightest". In other words, Trump clarified that he is quoting border guards regarding which Mexicans are coming here ILLEGALLY (border guards don't deal with legal immigration), and that some of those (surprise, surprise) are criminals, so we do better to stick with LEGAL immigration in order to get Mexico's best and brightest. Naturally, though, Yahoo has removed our ability to correct their misquote on their site, so I am left no choice but to do it here instead. They've forced us into their echo chamber and then they wonder why their audience is leaving.
-
SHEA SIMPSON
commented
I have been an avid Yahoo news follower for many years BUT as of lately (Trump's Presidential term), Yahoo has become completely one-sided. I thought news media outlets were to stay biased and just print factual news, but not Yahoo. Yahoo prints here-say stories and then later when facts come out, you do not print any type of retraction. Media has divided our country politically, racially and culturally. Shame on you!
-
John Cannon
commented
YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF
-
Michael H Mohr
commented
Why do you always have liberal anti conservative news stories on your home page.Not balanced! I'm about to drop you as my email source. Been here a long time.
-
Gala Stasyuk
commented
enough with Nazi comparisons US is not a Nazi Germany
-
Lyla Wickstrum
commented
breathe. Before Twitter, Facebook, and all the others were not around
when they founders wrote the First Amendment and talked about freedom of speech. They still have the means of free speech and if they
actually think they do, it proves there limited education. It is such as shame that they have limited themselves in a world that is fairly difficult to limit a persons freedom of speech. Trump and his BASE as he calls
them surely picked the wrong person to follow into there "deep state"
with. A man that has no real concept to what this country has to offer.
A country that backs everyones freedom to believe in what they want
as long as what they are after is a truth and just platform Why would any one fight this type of freedom. It is a puzzlement to me and if you
believe in this country why would you pick as a leader someone like
Trump who has a limited view into what this country has to offer. It goes only as far as Trump's mental limits because he thinks he is so
smart, smarter than anyone else. He limits you and him and he limits
your expension into what this country stands for. It is very sad and why
would anyone tie their beliefs to his tail because his tail is limited to
what is good for him-he cares nothing about what is good for you. -
DMZ
commented
Yahoo has shown themselves to be Politically Corrupt by turning off the comments section a few months before the election. The media has no real argument to political issue, therefore, silencing opposition is the safest way out. Yahoo is participating in voter suppression and interfering with free speech. The media has become "politically corrupt". I have no faith in Yahoo.
-
Pam Weathers
commented
How do I get this communist yahoo **** off my computer? You want to stop my free speech and I want to get rid of your lying **** off my computer.
-
Denise Crisci
commented
You guys stink!
-
Lyla Wickstrum
commented
Why would we want to Impeach a president that has done a great job
for his whole term and the last 12 days he does this? Now does anyone
with a lick of smarts actually going to use that argument. Trump did a
good job, would someone tell this person he needs to immediately go
into therapy because he does not know what is going on and if he
was an elected officials he needs to be sanctioned. Doesn't it scare
anyone else that this is a person that is going to help run our country?
It scares the **** out of me. We have important issues coming up
and this is not someone who is worthy to hold office. -
Kim Smith
commented
am so SICK of how the media attacks one of the best Presidents the United States has had in YEARS. And along with that, stop reporting that the Republicans and Conservatives are responsible for the riots in the Capitol, because if you know ANYTHING about the conservatives, then you would KNOW that rioting and destroying property goes against everything we believe in. THE RIOTING IS ALL ON THE LIBERALS!!
-
lisa good
commented
Have you seen any Trump supporters riot and commit violence in the last year. No, you haven't because they don't. What you have seen is Antifa and BLM, rioting, looting and killing. So, think a minute - Antifa and/or BLM" were photographed at the riots and at the Capitol. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to add 2 + 2 together. I know you all are liberals - but the rest of us are not unwise to your bias and lying.
-
Garry Herman
commented
Who gives a **** what georgette looney says??? He is a ***** who does not even live here anymore. Spends most of his time in europe and comes here to make a movie every once in awhile. You get or pick the worst opinion writers on the planet.
-
Earl Shorris
commented
Your writers are full of misinformation. You are petty and everyone is disgusted by you.