Skip to content

Big Deal

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 6th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Big Deal commented  · 

    way too complicated for the simpletons that run Yahoo. Remember, the hiring criteria for Yahoo staff is being able to tie your shoes in under 4 minutes.

  2. 3rd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Big Deal commented  · 

    agreed. Positional roster limits are typical on most sites. Let each private league make its own decisions please.

    Yahoo: Please stop sucking so bad. You are an embarrassment to the term "customer service".

  3. 2nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Big Deal commented  · 

    Face it. Yahoo sucks. There is no legitimate reason why private Keeper or Dynasty leagues should not be able to use Yahoo to conduct off season trades and allow roster modifications.

    This ridiculously stupid message that we can't adjust rosters or make trades because "the league has not yet drafted" makes it quite clear that Yahoo staff are clueless. It's like Yahoo hires only challenged chimpanzees to manage its fantasy sites.

    Of course, the primo chimp of all is the yahoo staff member who continually attacks legitimate suggestions under the anonymous alias. It's always the same guy, by the way. You can tell from his snarky, arrogant responses. What a an a-hole!

    Big Deal supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base