Skip to content

DEVASTATOR J S

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 12th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DEVASTATOR J S commented  · 

    I strongly agree. I have long ago lobbied for larger rosters, supplemental squads, and more defined player positions -- WILL (weakside LB), Mike (middle LB), Sam (strongside LB), SS (strong safety), FS (free safety) -- as our leagues use every available position.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DEVASTATOR J S commented  · 

    My two leagues are at dynasty level. What we have been seeking for the past few years is an expanded roster AND a Developmental Squad of perhaps 5-8 players. The expanded roster makes for true NFL depth.

    The Developmental Squad would allow managers to hold on to rookies or other fringe/2nd-tier players -- QBs,for instance -- to be slowly "groomed" over a two-year period while awaiting their "break-out". At the end of the 2-year period, the player will need to be added to the regular roster or waived.

    DEVASTATOR J S supported this idea  · 
  2. 51st ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DEVASTATOR J S commented  · 

    It has been at least a decade since our league has suggested Supplemental Squads and more defined roster positions -- WILL (weakside LB), Mike (middle LB), Sam (strongside LB), SS (strong safety), FS (free safety).

    I just noticed a comment on a different site (Reddit) that suggests some fantasy platforms do have supplemental squads. We've always chosen Yahoo because of it's user-friendly platform, but perhaps you're no longer the 'king of the hill' in fantasy.

    I'd like to get a legitimate response relative to these suggestions that I may determine whether my leagues should remain in Yahoo. My league IDs are: #3422 and #3427.

    Thank you.

    DEVASTATORS

    DEVASTATOR J S supported this idea  · 
  3. 2nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DEVASTATOR J S supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DEVASTATOR J S commented  · 

    Rosters should be expanded to a minimum of 48 players and a section of the team page should be created for a developmental squad.

  4. 18th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DEVASTATOR J S supported this idea  · 
  5. 8th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DEVASTATOR J S supported this idea  · 
  6. 4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DEVASTATOR J S supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base