Martian31v

← Yahoo Feedback

My feedback

  1. Allow players to be benched or inserted during double header

    18th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  7 comments  ·  Fantasy Baseball » Scoring  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Martian31v supported this idea  · 

  2. Yahoo!, please make it possible to perform 3 team trades.

    5th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  36 comments  ·  Fantasy Football » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Martian31v commented  · 

    3 way trades! Lets see it for baseball season. Great idea.

    Martian31v supported this idea  · 

  3. More flexible playoff sytems

    2nd ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  252 comments  ·  Fantasy Baseball » Playoffs  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Martian31v commented  · 

    I would only enter this Roto/H2H/Playoff Hybrid by mistake. Then Quit in a fit of rage. Then complain about it incessantly in Yahoo feedback.

  4. Please add Wins + Quality Starts as a category! Thanks!

    4th ranked

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering feedback  ·  72 comments  ·  Fantasy Baseball  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Martian31v supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Martian31v commented  · 

    This might actually work. And i never agree to changes in 5x5 Roto. It seems to satisfy the "disgruntled" SP, from both sides, and without creating reactionary changes to other categories and player values. Meaning no other category is effected, and no SP gains QS value. This should reflect in 0 value changes. If you ran a simulation mock, there should not be significant value changes to SP. If that is true, then you can apply the new metric and squash that debate. Martian.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)